The Bard's Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years ago

Experiments

mander.xyz

message-square
31
link
fedilink
570

Experiments

mander.xyz

fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
31
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • nihilomaster@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    2 years ago

    I could swear I have built all of those in Spore at some point.

  • Adalast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 years ago

    Geez, it’s like nobody has ever played Spore.

    • Ice Tree@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      Spore

      More spikes is always the correct solution.

    • merari42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Too few phallic animals for that

  • Dagnet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 years ago

    Just play Spore and you will understand

    • chasingtheflow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Was spore worthwhile?

      • Dagnet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        2 years ago

        At the time it was revolutionary, till this day I haven’t seen any attempts at recreating it. I did prefer the earlier 2 stages tho (as in evolution stages), later it wasnt as much fun.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          It was more revolutionary the day before it was released than the day after though. That game was my first lesson in not getting hyped about something just based on what marketers were saying.

          The game could have used at least a few more years of baking. The earlier stages were more complete, though IMO even they lacked breadth and depth. But the later ones were disappointing in their simplicity.

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    It was the N64 era of evolution.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    Life got pretty boring following the last mass extinction. So many mammals evolved from that mouse which survived that we all have the same basic features from hamsters to humans. So much so that mice are a good experimental model for humans…

  • azi@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 years ago

    First one looks like an urchin with pattern baldness

  • Neon 🏳️‍🌈🇺🇦🇪🇺🏳️‍⚧️🇹🇼🇮🇱🏳️‍🌈@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    okay, but seriously, why did they evolve so differently than modern-day fish? and if we magically reintroduced them, would they be more fit or less fit than modern-day fish?

    • pyrflie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator

    • ImInLoveWithLife@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      I am not a biologist or really anyone with any authority on the matter. Just some guy who likes to read and think about all manner of subjects, so I cannot adequately explain anything here, but if you’re interested in the why, it really boils down to the simplicity of morphological structures early in the development of life on earth, to more complex as evolution did its thing. That’s not to say that evolution has a goal, just that added complexity often means greater advantages. Also, it isn’t as though nothing similar to these creatures exist at all today. These basal forms were a prerequisite to the life we see in the oceans (and on land) today.

      Definitely stay interested and read more about morphology and evolution in general! Fascinating stuff.

  • Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    It was a different meta back then. Bottom right is as apex predator

  • BreadOven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    You know what they’re doing? Their goddamned best.

  • CptEnder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    Early devbrach alpha build, balancing and design got implemented through testing.

  • embed_me@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Tatakae

  • THCDenton@lemmy.worldBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Removed by mod

  • bbuez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    OP acting like they got a chance against #1 smh…

    #3 still lives today in the form of night terrors, seriously wtf is that thing?

    • Classy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Honestly 2 gets me. Hallucagenia!

  • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Or, just like dinossaurs, we don’t know how they actually looked like because fossile records only contain bones.

    • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 years ago

      Other tissues can become fossilized but it’s less common as the conditions need to be just right. That’s how we know some dinosaurs had feathers and what their skin texture was like.

      Cambrian genera like Hallucigenia completely lacked bones and we have numerous fossils of them from deposits of shale. That’s how we know what they looked like: tiny Lovecraftian horrors.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      we know almost exactly how psittacosaurus looked:

      • ExperimentalGuy@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        How

        • cone_zombie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          80’s haircuts

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueoeO_9Eu_E

      • OlinOfTheHillPeople@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psittacosaurus

Science Memes@mander.xyz

science_memes@mander.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !science_memes@mander.xyz

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

  • !spiders@lemmy.world

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

  • !academia@mander.xyz
  • !science@mander.xyz
  • !scicomm@mander.xyz

Biology and Life Sciences

  • !abiogenesis@mander.xyz
  • !animal-behavior@mander.xyz
  • !anthropology@mander.xyz
  • !arachnology@mander.xyz
  • !balconygardening@slrpnk.net
  • !biodiversity@mander.xyz
  • !biology@mander.xyz
  • !biophysics@mander.xyz
  • !botany@mander.xyz
  • !ecology@mander.xyz
  • !entomology@mander.xyz
  • !fermentation@mander.xyz
  • !herpetology@mander.xyz
  • !houseplants@mander.xyz
  • !medicine@mander.xyz
  • !microscopy@mander.xyz
  • !mycology@mander.xyz
  • !nudibranchs@mander.xyz
  • !nutrition@mander.xyz
  • !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
  • !palaeontology@mander.xyz
  • !photosynthesis@mander.xyz
  • !plantid@mander.xyz
  • !plants@mander.xyz
  • !reptiles and amphibians@mander.xyz

Physical Sciences

  • !astronomy@mander.xyz
  • !chemistry@mander.xyz
  • !earthscience@mander.xyz
  • !geography@mander.xyz
  • !geospatial@mander.xyz
  • !nuclear@mander.xyz
  • !physics@mander.xyz
  • !quantum-computing@mander.xyz
  • !spectroscopy@mander.xyz

Humanities and Social Sciences

  • !archaeology@mander.xyz
  • !folklore@mander.xyz
  • !history@mander.xyz
  • !old_maps@mander.xyz

Practical and Applied Sciences

  • !exercise-and sports-science@mander.xyz
  • !gardening@mander.xyz
  • !self sufficiency@mander.xyz
  • !soilscience@slrpnk.net
  • !terrariums@mander.xyz
  • !timelapse@mander.xyz

Memes

  • !bushrat_confidential@slrpnk.net
  • !science_memes@mander.xyz

Miscellaneous

  • !answered@mander.xyz
  • !mander@mander.xyz
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 371 users / day
  • 1.22K users / week
  • 5.03K users / month
  • 12.7K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 19.1K subscribers
  • 6.16K Posts
  • 86.5K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Salamander@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@mander.xyz
  • SciBot@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • BE: 0.19.14
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org