fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agoAdvanced Mathsmander.xyzimagemessage-square6linkfedilinkarrow-up1168arrow-down17
arrow-up1161arrow-down1imageAdvanced Mathsmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square6linkfedilink
minus-squareassa123@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·edit-22 years agoWell, those properties are only for holomorphic functions, otherwise it’s just as hard or worse. Edit: ’
minus-squareitsnotits@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 years ago it’s* just as hard
minus-squareKogasa@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoHolomorphicity is equivalent to (or defined as) being differentiable in a nonempty, connected, open set, so it’s not asking much. Even then, functions which fail to be holomorphic can often be classified in a similarly rigid way.
Well, those properties are only for holomorphic functions, otherwise it’s just as hard or worse. Edit: ’
Holomorphicity is equivalent to (or defined as) being differentiable in a nonempty, connected, open set, so it’s not asking much. Even then, functions which fail to be holomorphic can often be classified in a similarly rigid way.