• CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    The argument I did make is the non-competes were never there to "retain talent.

    Then why were they there?

    • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      To prevent people from being paid by multiple companies at the same time, which is a thing only execs do…

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        A non-compete is, in essence, a clause that dictates whether a worker can find employment (or create a product) that directly competes with their employer—even if they aren’t working for them anymore. Typically, these will last around six months to a year after the end of employment, but they can last longer.

        Six months to a year after employment is hardly “at the same time.”