• JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    2 years ago

    A number of years ago when cupcake shops were opening everywhere, there was this one called Mancakes that did “manly” cupcakes (think bacon and alcohol). I finally broke down one day and decided to try one. I went with the “Buffalo wings” cupcake which turned out to be what I guess was Frank’s Red Hot flavoured cake, topped with icing and some sort of crispy sprinkles (chicken skin?), and stuffed with (to my gagging surprise) blue cheese icing.

    I love hot wings, I love blue cheese dip, and cupcakes are just fine.

    But a buffalo wing cupcake has to be the nastiest concoction to be called a cupcake that I’ve ever tasted.

  • Yaztromo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Growing up my mother would occasionally make a dish my father enjoyed that she called “Depression Dinner”. It was mashed potatoes covered in fried ground beef with beef gravy poured on top of it.

    I like mashed potatoes. I like using ground beef in a variety of dishes. And who can say anything bad about gravy? But mix those three together — ugh, no thanks. It was like baby food for adults. There was a reason why my brother and I took to calling it Depressing Dinner growing up.

      • Yaztromo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Oh certainly changing the presentation, texture, and separation of the ingredients can make a big difference in a dish! I’d say the difference between “depression dinner” and Shepard’s pie is like the difference between cake batter and cake — they’re both made up of the exact same stuff, but one is a gloopy mess you’d probably not want to eat a whole bowl of, and the other is delicious cake you’ll want a second serving of.

        • JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I hear ya, altho at the same time your DD as is doesn’t sound that bad to me.

          Of course, I’d want to drain the hell out of that ground beef and cook it with some chili mix, too. Without some simple steps like that I could indeed see how it might taste more like oily Gerbers.

          • Yaztromo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            To be clear — Mom’s “Depression Dinner” was in fact just greasy fried ground beef poured over mashed potatoes. No spices. I don’t even think she used any salt or pepper. Oily Gerbers would be a perfectly apt description!

    • VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      Similar to beef mince, onions, gravy and mash for me. My da loves it but I found the combo depressing despite the fact I used to eat mash out of the pot with a spoon. And yes I’m Irish.

  • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Really unpopular opinion, peanut butter and jelly. I do not like them together nor do I even like peanut butter with added sugar.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    Garbage plates, holy crap. For those of you who don’t know, a garbage plate refers to a famous “cuisine” in Upstate New York, comprising of random picnic ingredients thrown together like a salad and is understandably the butt of many jokes because it is to cuisine what the back-scratching-hair-combing-nose-picking-ukulele-tuner is to inventions. On top of that, every restaurant has its own take on it that varies the recipe, so you will never know exactly how it is unless you’ve already touched that particular restaurant. The one time where I’d prefer each set to be sold separately (and batteries to not be included, gawd).

  • lemmefixdat4u@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    I once tried sardine ice cream. I love sardines and I love ice cream. The only place I want them to mix is AFTER they are in my stomach.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    Mostly not picky anymore but oh how I hate raisins or grapes in curry or any savory dish. Yuck, yuck, yuck. Really picky about fruit in anything, apple in mulligatawny and in chicken salad eew.

    But the Mexican fruit salad that has mango, pineapple, jicama, orange and ONION and crumbled cheese? I love it and nobody else in my household does.

    • dethjon@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m your evil twin in regard to raisins. I like them in savory dishes and salads, but can’t stand them in desserts and baked goods.

      • RBWells@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        That’s how I feel about peanuts. Boiled peanuts, peanut noodle, Kung Pao, all good. Peanut butter cookies? Eeeeew.

  • Captain Janeway@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Anything “salad” where the salad includes tuna, mayo, or egg. I can’t handle it. I don’t know why. Egg salad. Tuna salad. 🤢

    I like salad. I like eggs. I like tuna somewhat. I like mayo somewhat. But any of those weird combinations make me sick.

  • MelonYellow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t do turkey and cranberry sauce, porkchop with applesauce, paté with jam/chutneys… something about meat and fruit sauce. Well but I don’t like chicken and waffles either. Oh, and bacon donuts!

    • Leviathan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      First generation montrealer here of Italian descent: that sauce is a bastardized Greek meat sauce, there is nothing remotely spaghetti or Italian about it.

      I actually love Italian poutine for what it is, but I would never put that sauce on spaghetti or call a sauce that routinely contains cinnamon and oregano an Italian sauce.

      • InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Agreed, my comment would be said with the words “Italian” and “spaghetti” in airquotes.

        Never seen one with cinnamon, then again I just don’t order those.
        I’ll have to check with my gf who does.

      • Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Bro. Bro.

        Belle province, all dressed steamies and an “Italian” Poutine. My god.

        Sure as fuck ain’t Italian or a good meat sauce but as a combo that shit slaps.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I don’t eat meat anymore but I’m from Cincy and do occasionally crave a 5 way, hell even a 4 or 3 way (yes seriously that’s what our iconic company for this dish calls its dishes, skyline knows what they’re doing). My wife would fucking love this as a poutine as it sounds like it’s just a 3 way with fries instead of spaghetti.

            • Leviathan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Usually it’s fries, curds, fries, curds, sauce. Cheapo places won’t double up the curds but the good places definitely do. If that’s what you have in mind you guys should roll by Montreal.

    • 8dotpi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I had to look up what poutine was, and I can assure you that we don’t have anything like that in Italy

  • Alice@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Let me confess that I didn’t actually eat this, so maybe it actually whipped ass. Once a friend ran for donuts and I asked them to pick something up for me. They came back with a donut with maple icing and bacon bits sprinkled on top.

    The sight and smell were so upsetting to me that I shoved it in my purse when no one was looking and never got around to trying it.

    • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Maple doughnuts with bacon bits are FANTASTIC! I was leery at first, but they truly rock.

      • Alice@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        I might just have a weird aversion to meat and sweets, because I also mentioned thinking jelly on a sausage biscuit was gross once, and no one agreed.

  • InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Non native english speaker here, not trying to have an argument but to learn.
    Is it correct to use “whose” in this context?

    I kinda thought “whose” was meant to refer to a person and not an object, but really I don’t know.
    Though I’d use something like “of which” or whatever else instead.

    (Or just do what I do and rephrase it so you don’t need to bother with this syntax to begin with.)
    “What is a dish where each individual component you like, but when combined together become a dish you think is nasty?”

    • communism@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m not a native English speaker either but I’ve spoken English from a young age. “Whose” is used to denote belonging, not necessarily personhood, which can be confusing as “who” does denote personhood. There isn’t really a “whose” equivalent for objects so it’s used for any noun which another noun belongs to.

      • Jojo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, you shouldn’t use who’s for objects, as in the one “who is” doing something; that should be “that’s” or "which is. But for possession like this case “that’s” doesn’t work at all. “Of which” or “for which” might work in this sentence, but I don’t think any native speaker would be confused by whose here

    • HatchetHaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      In this context, “whose” works fine, on the basis that almost no other options work at all outside of completely rewriting the question.

      I personally would just switch it out for “with” instead; it does slightly reframe the phrase but doesn’t change the question itself.

    • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      “Whose” should probably be “thats”. But a native English speaker will occasionally personify things and so the meaning would be the same, but you are correct.