In the last couple of months I have noticed an increasing trend of supplying me search results that are completely unrelated to the current query and tie back to my location or previous searches. I can say this with a high degree of certainty this is without a doubt beyond the 100th instance this has happened.

My browser is configured against tracking and fingerprinting (in fact all my devices are) which would make it fairly difficult to retain any data unless they are profiling me.

  • @LWD@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    111 year ago

    It’s really bizarre that DuckDuckGo doesn’t allow you to disable location based results. You can use a VPN, but then you’ll start getting location based results on that location instead.

    • Thanks for mentioning Kagi! I’ve been looking for some Google/DDG replacement but every single one I’ve tried had some sort of dealbreaking drawback for me. Google collects all my data and heavily filters my results, DDG provides dogshit results most of the time I don’t even bother using it, Startpage is awfully slow, and I didn’t even get to understand what Searx is as looking for it led me to some random ugly pages.

      Subbed for 1 year 10 bucks plan. Works super-fast on mobile too. Hell yeah!

  • @mtchristo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    251 year ago

    It has been doing this shit for a while. Returning results based on just one key word out of many keywords from my query.

    Lately they have been even ignoring the restrictive +“keyword” syntax and returning whatever shit just so they won’t admit their (or Microsoft’s indexer) is shit

    • @DetectiveSanity@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      It’s not the fact that there are filler results that bothers me, after all there might not be results for everything we may possibly search.

      It’s the fact that these are links to services which have a tie to my unique identifiers which I deliberately declined access to in all available ways!

  • @Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    I have searx, and i’m feeling like a god of search, better than google, better that bingbinggo, and anything else Although I had a lot of problems with it when I was hosting it on a RPI and docker, now i’m not, and it’s just so much better

  • @electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    I get the same shit at work where I can’t use a VPN: like 7-8 relevant results then basically just ads for local businesses after that.

  • sar1n
    link
    fedilink
    711 year ago

    I’ve also noticed that if you do a search, click a result, then hit back to go back to the results they manipulate the results in some weird way so they’re not the exact same results you got the first time. Infuriating

  • Yes, I have the same issue with DDG for something like a year now. I can’t use it anymore for basic searches, I feel like the bing api they are using is getting worse and worse.

  • @skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    On DDG I can type in an exact company or product name and not get a proper result, it’s crazy. Google seems to find the stuff no problem, it’s really quite frustrating when the search engine isn’t even capable of basic queries.

  • @ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    I have still the same good results in ddg, no matter what device or browser. I have noticed that they have some location bias when ddg (and any other search engine i have tried) has non good results globaly but good resulta locally.

    Still better then anything i have tested. Just because there are minor anomalies i will stick with them.

  • Gazumi
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    What would we suggest as a realistic alternative? Sears? Startpage? Brave? (I am no expert by the way, just looking for tips)

    • @coughrelief@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Searx sucks for images in my experience, startpage was bought by an advertising company, brave is weird for a multitude of reasons but I don’t know how good their search engine is as I’ve never tried it

      However I do think that finding a searx instance that works for you and then using another engine like ddg for images is the way to go… You could add a shortcut like “.ddg garbage truck” for easily searching with for example ddg on firefox

    • @currycourier@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      171 year ago

      I just switched to using Kagi recently and I like it a lot so far! Theres a free tier for 100/searches a month you can use to figure out if you like it.

    • Timber
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      I’ve been using metager for some while and really like it. They’re also part of an initiative pushing for a free as in freedom search index, so that’s nice

  • @TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    401 year ago

    Odd. I wonder what is going on here because when I search that exact same query I get accurate results.

    I’ve had iffy search results before but never anything that bad.

    • @ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I also returned totally accurate results using the exact same query. I would really like to know what is going on here. This is a common complaint with some people using DDG, that the results are poor, but I consistently have as good if not better results than using Google.

    • solidsnake2085
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Kagi was my favorite but their pricing model is a little too high still. If it was $5 for 500 searches I would do that but the unlimited for $10 is just a bit too high for me.

  • @I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    It might be blindly searching for websites that contain any of the words scan, mark 2, pro.

    It seems to do that when it can’t find a page with all of the words, and the only way I know to fix it is put the whole thing in quotation marks.

  • I turned JS off other than for specific websites. This includes DDG. It gives me accurate results, although the other commenters don’t seem be facing your problem either