• MrMusAddict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    In my opinion this is actually better than the CoC. The only thing “missing” is the definition of which qualities you shouldn’t discriminate against. But that’s now generalized into “groups of people”.

    I still can’t discriminate against people based on any qualification. Hell, I technically can’t discriminate against “pineapple on pizza eaters”.

    • Dharma Curious@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 years ago

      Good. Because it’s fucking delicious and I don’t care what the internet says. We all loved it in the 90s, and nothing has changed. It’s still delicious, we just do less coke now.

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 years ago

        You heretic! I want you to know that if I could discriminate against you for putting pineapple on pizza, I absolutely would!

        • tpihkal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          I respect their right to put pineapple pizza, but I’ll be damned if our pizzas are going to touch.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      By my reading of it, you can still discriminate against pineapple pizza eaters, or any other group whatsoever, you just can’t harass, bully, violate their privacy or threaten them with violence. Which is fine by me, if someone wants to make a community only for ginger haired people and ban anyone they think isn’t naturally ginger, that’s their perogative.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 years ago

        That was my takeaway, too, and I think it’s positive. The nice thing is, if it turns out that the policy fosters behavior that’s bad for the broader community, they can change it.

        • AvaddonLFC ☄️ 🤘@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          Of course we would, and that’s also exactly why we invited users to discuss and provide feedback while launching it. It is a living document, and we hope to update and improve it periodically and consistently.

          • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            Some people have given you guys a lot of flack, but I really think you’re making a thoughtful, good faith effort to do things right, and I think you’re doing well. There have been a couple things that I thought were the wrong decision, but (1) they’ve been relatively minor, and (2) they’ve been reasonable even if I might have chosen differently. I very much appreciate the thought that goes into running this place.

            • AvaddonLFC ☄️ 🤘@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              Thank you. I appreciate your sincere response, and I can assure you the rest of our team will too. Differences in decisions may naturally occur, of course, but I think being able to reason things is what matters in the end. Here’s wishing you a great one.