• Dudewitbow@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      132
      ·
      2 years ago

      The advantage atm is that valves privately owned. The moment they go public, be very wary.

      • BallShapedMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 years ago

        That’s the biggest piece, smaller but worth mentioning is they make money off of our purchases directly unlike Google.

    • blunderworld@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      Valve opened in the late 90s and is privately owned. Never say never where corporations and capitalism are concerned… But hopefully they wont take the evil google approach this late in the game. I think good will from their customers really sets them apart from competitors like Epic.

      • vivadanang@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        And damn near every single Google effort into the games space has failed except for android games, which ride on the enormous platform install. Their latest effort was a joke - stadia was DOA.

        I respect valve because they’ve provided indie game devs with the same distribution AAA studios get, they’ve never asked for exclusivity and did tons of uncompensated VR pioneering (remember Abrash and co were Valve before Oculus) and never once tried to ‘own’ vr. And they’re a private company, so that means the decisions - and investments - they’ve made worked out enough to free them of a board dicking shit up.

        Keep going, Valve. I don’t like everything they do, but overall they’re a gem in value added.