257m@lemmy.ml to Programming@programming.dev · 3 years agoWhat are your programming hot takes?message-squaremessage-square589linkfedilinkarrow-up1269arrow-down113
arrow-up1256arrow-down1message-squareWhat are your programming hot takes?257m@lemmy.ml to Programming@programming.dev · 3 years agomessage-square589linkfedilink
minus-squareCrisps@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up40arrow-down2·3 years agoDynamically typed languages don’t scale. Large project bases become hard to maintain, read and refactor. Basic type errors which should be found in compilation become runtime errors or unexpected behavior.
minus-squareDaisy (she/her)@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·3 years agoNot really a hot take. Why do you think most dynamic languages have the option to tack on static typing?
minus-squareMashedTech@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 years agoWe can feel it in our bones… And boy is it a pain when you find a huge codebase that is JS only or python without types. Fucking hell dealing with that shit
Dynamically typed languages don’t scale. Large project bases become hard to maintain, read and refactor.
Basic type errors which should be found in compilation become runtime errors or unexpected behavior.
Not really a hot take. Why do you think most dynamic languages have the option to tack on static typing?
deleted by creator
We can feel it in our bones… And boy is it a pain when you find a huge codebase that is JS only or python without types. Fucking hell dealing with that shit