I can only see this going into a very dystopian path. Based on their actions, I don’t trust these companies, their security practices, nor their privacy policies. Why would I give them my biometrics? And my full palm, at that!? Hell no!

  • @dan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    Shit no! You know what you can’t change if/when they inevitably leak your data? Your fucking hand.

    • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Haha sorry, mate. Yeah, I wish it was that. I’d whip mine out real quick.

  • Stoneykins [any]
    link
    fedilink
    82 years ago

    I still think the idea of tech implants are cool but I’ve also reached the point where I wouldn’t get one unless I learned to build it myself and was in charge of every single aspect of it.

    Considering I lack degrees in medicine and computer science, I don’t think I’ll have them done anytime soon lol

  • @stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 years ago

    Forget about privacy, this is just fucking dumb

    One point of failure that can’t be replaced if stolen?

    This won’t ever take off, and will most definitely die out quickly in favor of literally any other technique including just embedding an nfc chip and battery to your palm surgically. Which I probably still wouldn’t be thrilled about but

    • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I’ve see where you can pay with your fingerprint at some venders. It’s a similar concept, in terms of single point of failure. Regardless, I hope you’re right.

      E: **mostly right. I won’t embed anything in my skin for payments. CC or cash or phone NFC (and I don’t like that one for it’s security implications). That’s it.

        • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          {At the board meeting}

          Alex: “I wonder if we could do this”

          Blake: “Maybe we should talk about whether we should?”

          [Blake gets thrown out the window]

          {Several months later}

          Moss: (sees device at a retailer) what the crap? Terrible idea!

  • Dissasterix
    link
    fedilink
    392 years ago

    Its hard to believe anyone would use the thing. It’ll be more problematic if/when its used for regulatory purposes. Sort of at the desensitization still. Today.

    I had to take a State exam for licensure a few years back. I was told that I had to take a palm/vein scan to prove my identity. I informed her Ive never had one so it could not prove my identity-- but hey, Im the crazy one. Its on a server somewhere now tho… Modernity is pretty stupid, tbh.

    • @FReddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      Then there’s always the old, “Hey, I’ll cut off this dude’s hand and use it to buy stuff until he runs out of credit – or rigor mortis sets in.”

    • guajojo
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      The thing it these readers are so convenient, my only complain is I wish they would work as the password hash technology. But as of right now we don’t know for sure if that machine is saving a “hash” of your palm or is directly saving a copy of the original biometric data that would allow it to “recreate” your biometric ID somewhere else

      • Dissasterix
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        I dont think its even that convenient! It requires electricity, web connectivity and loads of digital logic. My state ID just tangibly exists.

      • Jilanico
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        Most folks probably would. Privacy is often at odds with convenience.

        • @zefiax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          I just don’t subscribe to the slippery slope arguments I am provided when it comes to privacy. I and I suspect most other people just prefer convenience to some hypothetical threat to what I am not sure.

      • Dissasterix
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Naturally. But don’t get black-pilled :] They want us demoralized.

  • Joe Bidet
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 years ago

    Oh no! I trashed my faithful Palm Pilot ™ years ago :/

    • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      I trashed the Pilot. But I still have the Pre and Pixi haha

      Well, one of them has Android now…

  • @Famborghini@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 years ago

    I will forever refuse to do this. That RealID thing or whatever they’re calling it that the government is doing with the face scan gives me nightmares

  • @frustbox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    422 years ago

    One scar away from losing access to your ability to pay …

    Biometrics can not really be changed. Except maybe through time or trauma (i.e. age or injury). They can be used to uniquely(?) identify a person - except maybe twins - at the expense of anonymity, which has it’s own set of problems.

    But because they can not easily be changed they’re a terrible security feature. Once they leak, they’re unusable and you’re hosed. You can’t issue a new palm print for your bank account like you could a new chip card and password.

    Also, just because you waved your hand over a scanner does not mean that you approve and consent of the transaction. With tap to pay there were ideas of mobile point of sales devices just tapping on peoples backpacks in a crowded area. You don’t even keep your biometrics markers in your pocket, they’re just out in the open for anyone with a camera. This may be bordering on paranoia, but a few years back (2014) German hackers from Chaos Computer Club took iris scans from Angela Merkel (then Chancellor of Germany) and finger prints of Ursula von der Leyen (then Minister of defense) using nothing but press fotos. Cameras have only gotten better.

    TL;DR: Biometrics can be used for identification but should never be used for authorisation.

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      This is Amazon One. Amazon is rolling it out pretty aggressively in their American grocery stores right now. Looks like it’s moved out of its pilot stage and is getting a national US rollout.

      https://one.amazon.com

  • @ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 years ago

    I like to do this at Whole Foods in front of my anti vax friends and tell them about how cool it is to have a chip that lets me pay by waving my hand.

  • tommy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    My dad who lives in a small village (around 5k people) has his account in a local bank. Nothing really differs this bank from big companies. Theyre just local. So my dad has this axcount and we are in a city nearby and want to do some shopping, spend some money on gear etc. But he looks for cash and its not in car. Then, ofc, he looks for his wallet with all his cards and he hasnt it too. So we are kinda fucked up and going back home and to shops would take an hour. (We were low on gas too.) So he withdraws cash with his fucking hand. Fucking hand. Pretty useful tbh but rather not safe.

    • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 years ago

      For the same reason this isn’t a good idea. Privacy aside, when your biometrics get leaked (and they will), you’ll have no recourse, because biometrics are literally a part of your body and you can’t change them.

      • @Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        How do biometrics get leaked ? Can they 3d print my finger ? What difference does it make to all my dsta getting sold on the daily ? I don’t see how it changes things

        • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          They don’t need to 3D print anything, only to “side load” the hash (it’s more complex than that, but that’s the gist). If your ID is tied to your finances, and it gets leaked, you can’t change your ID. Your finger/palmprint is always your finger/palmprint.

          • @Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Right. But can’t they do that anyway? Your ID is linked to your finances. You get people stealing IDs all day everyday.

            Family Guy did an episode on it.

            If I’ve got your records you I’d birth certificate your job numbers your state details. Address phone emails passport passwords. I’m you. Except I have my biometrics.

            Biometrics cannot be forcibly taken. I can’t rock up to the bank manager with a severed finger. Yet I can take out a loan in your name without the fingerprint.

            For fuck sake our security relies on signature. A badly written name.