• This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Can you write a code that would sort the input string from smallest to largest?

        You would like to have it, wouldn't you? You fucken nerd.

    • SuperFola
      link
      fedilink
      English
      281 year ago

      People prefer having something generating shitty code and not checking it, instead of asking or searching on internet for a substantially better solution

      • @gosling@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        You mean shitty code which you can just check and ask them to change in almost real time, over posting your question on SO and waiting for months for an answer?

      • @ofak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Chatgpt is still a tool and it’s up to the user how to use it. If you google “bolognese recipe” you get one result; if you Google “traditional ragu from Bologna” you get another. Same for ChatGPT.

      • @EatMyDick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -51 year ago

        You are delusional and will be left behind if that is your view point. The code is usually largely accurate only needing a few tweaks. Easily one of the most powerful scaffolding and learning tool I’ve used in 25 years. Our developers embracing it are more efficient then ever and passing static analysis, owasp scans, coding standards just fine if not better than cranky old devs who think they couldn’t possibly be helped by a dumb machine.

        • SuperFola
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I prefer being delusional and a cranky old dev, rather than trusting AI by giving all of my workplace code and logic. Powerful? Maybe. Helping you ship products faster? I don’t know ; no metrics have been published about that in controlled settings, and I still think people will get lazy and after some time even the ones that tweaked the code and analyzed it thoroughly will just stop caring.

          Go ahead, jump in that bandwagon, and prove me wrong in 5 years. All I want is proof.

          Also, I didn’t know one could be a cranky old dev after a few years of experience only

      • @ShortFuse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        People who fail to understand the value of peer-reviewed code are just going to copy/paste bad, but popular, code practices.

        There irony here is that Stackoverflow was considered a common source of copy/pasted code.