0x4E4F@infosec.pub to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agoNot my problem sortinfosec.pubimagemessage-square48linkfedilinkarrow-up1619arrow-down112
arrow-up1607arrow-down1imageNot my problem sortinfosec.pub0x4E4F@infosec.pub to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square48linkfedilink
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up39·1 year agoYou still have to check that it’s sorted, which is O(n). We’ll also assume that destroying the universe takes constant time.
minus-squareBatmanAoD@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up36·1 year agoIn the universe where the list is sorted, it doesn’t actually matter how long the destruction takes!
minus-squareBenjaben@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 year ago We’ll also assume that destroying the universe takes constant time. Well yeah just delete the pointer to it!
You still have to check that it’s sorted, which is O(n).
We’ll also assume that destroying the universe takes constant time.
In the universe where the list is sorted, it doesn’t actually matter how long the destruction takes!
amortized O(0)
Well yeah just delete the pointer to it!
universe.take()