• @Khanzarate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1315 months ago

      Right, but the whitespace between instructions wasn’t whitespace at all but white text on white background instructions to poison the copy-paste.

      Also the people who are using chatGPT to write the whole paper are probably not double-checking the pasted prompt. Some will, sure, but this isnt supposed to find all of them its supposed to catch some with a basically-0% false positive rate.

      • @technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It just takes one person to notice (or see a tweet like this) and tell everybody else that the teacher is setting a trap.

        Once the word goes out about this kind of thing, everybody will be double checking the prompt.

        • @Khanzarate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          I doubt it.

          For the same reasons, really. People who already intend to thoroughly go over the input and output to use AI as a tool to help them write a paper would always have had a chance to spot this. People who are in a rush or don’t care about the assignment, it’s easier to overlook.

          Also, given the plagiarism punishments out there that also apply to AI, knowing there’s traps at all is a deterrent. Plenty of people would rather get a 0 rather than get expelled in the worst case.

          If this went viral enough that it could be considered common knowledge, it would reduce the effectiveness of the trap a bit, sure, but most of these techniques are talked about intentionally, anyway. A teacher would much rather scare would-be cheaters into honesty than get their students expelled for some petty thing. Less paperwork, even if they truly didn’t care about the students.

    • FundMECFS
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      yes but copy paste includes the hidden part if it’s placed in a strategic location

        • @jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          No, because they think nothing of a request to cite Frankie Hawkes. Without doing a search themselves, the name is innocuous enough as to be credible. Given such a request, an LLM, even if it has some actual citation capability, currently will fabricate a reasonable sounding citation to meet the requirement rather than ‘understanding’ it can’t just make stuff up.