• @Tyfud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    742 months ago

    Evolution was all like: Ok, so which mutations would you like to advance? The venomous thing? The aquatic thing? The electrocuting enemies thing? The no stomach hack? The “Fun at parties” hack?

    Platypus: Yes.

    • The Bard in GreenA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      642 months ago

      An excellent example of spending your points all over the place and somehow ending up with an actually pretty broken build.

        • @computergeek125@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          432 months ago

          “broken build” here likely refers to the phrase as defined by gamers to function as synonymous to “overpowered”.

          As in, “the build is so broken you can’t/it is difficult to play against it”. This phraseology could be used by either an ally or an enemy, but it contextually changes connotation from positive for allies to negative for enemies.

          Build is often used as a shorthand for a character’s combination of items, skills, and levels (as the various games define it).

          • @stangel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            52 months ago

            Thanks, I (mis-?) interpreted it as a gamers build that doesn’t work because they spread abilities rather than min-maxing.

        • @Guilherme@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          So they were created about the same time as dinosaurs and flowers? Evolution was feeling really creative at that part of Cretaceous.

    • fraksken
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 months ago

      After the platypus, evolution started looking into input validation.