Around the same time, crypto will make traditional money worthless. The only wealthy ones will be those who invested early. Trust me.

I agree.

Do the meanings of words vary or change based on rhetorical stance, cultural context, or historic period?

Are mainstream media and mainstream practices the precedent you understand as the one to guide your choices toward the objectives you identify as meaningful?

The law protects private property.

If you defend the law, how would you overcome the wealth accumulation of billionaires through the legal construct of private property?

There may not be such an event in the foreseeable future, or at any rate, not in the next few days or weeks.

However, the request is not based on a worry about semantics, but rather an observation that language influences how people think and feel.

Preferring language such as claim or steal over earn helps emphasize that workers have an interest in eliminating a class who lives by our labor.

Using language as you have done serves to vindicate the class disparity, to erase the class antagonism, and to protect the interests of the owning class.

Please consider referring to the income of billionaires not as earnings.

Earning is based on achievement or merit. Profits are appropriated, claimed, or stolen, but not earned.

However, for those under certain illusions, exposing that the illusions fail on their merits helps some advance beyond them.

I suppose he must be very frugal with household expenses.

you can be anti-Israel without being antisemitic

The media tend to promote the narrative that the Palestinian struggle is inherently antisemitic. They offer very limited information about any liberatory factions that depart from the characterization of being hateful toward Jews.

Many defend Israel based on an assumption of its Jewish inhabitants facing an existential threat.

Based on information from mainstream outlets, there is little reason to doubt it.

Capitalism produces fragmentation and alienation that obstruct broader solidarity.

I am not understanding the question.

Is the premise that risk pooling among individuals, which is the basic scheme for all insurance, is in some sense dependent on private interests?

Not many would do well reading that script.

You can see the Wilks’s oily paw prints all over.

PU has already compiled the best ones.

The one mentioning the iPhone will long be a favorite.

“Landleech” certainly is more gender inclusive, so using it ought to be quite ingratiating to lady landleeches.

Perhaps there is growing momentum toward the left, which is not necessarily the same as a leftist movement.

Kochs and Wilkses.

Voting is fine, but meaningful change happens from the ground up.

Unions, based on trust and solidarity among the working class, are essential for building the kind of society that is the one in which we want to live.

I think the meaning of a paycheck is that your employer has decided it would benefit from your existence for at least a few more weeks, and therefore is willing to allow you to continue existing at least as long.

You are not adding clarity.

Your understanding is misguided.

Terse messages are used not because the broader messages lack substantive justification, but rather because repetition helps them gain enough attention that more of society will feel motivated to investigate and to reflect.