

No they allow admins to decide that. Users have no control. User activity is fully public and cannot be controlled for safety.


No they allow admins to decide that. Users have no control. User activity is fully public and cannot be controlled for safety.


Frankly, I don’t think the privacy model of the fediverse is workable at all and it doesn’t seem to be developed and maintained by people who understand or care about safety. The centralized systems are much safer for users because you only have to trust the admins of the centralized servers.
Fediverse’s Achilles heel is trust and all the convo and discussion about it is extremely dismissive and superficial about the realities of how the centralized systems became they way they are–much safer against stalking and mobs. Fediverse mostly gets away with this by being small and fringe.
The fundamental flaw is laid bare every time a site defederates another about because of safety issues. It’s a tacit concession that the federation model and implementation is not safe. If you have to defederate everyone to ensure user safety, then why bother with the fediverse in the first place? This is the core problem with the fediverse as it exists today.
Actually I think it may be your get_entry() code. The try traps all non-numbers and restarts the loop for new entry. So like typing “exit” or an empty string or anything that’s not convertible to a number is being trapped by the raise and sent back for reentry. And anything that is a number can’t hit the break. Just my guess.
Nothing really sticks out. It could also be something about how the automated checker provides input (maybe it expects to not press enter or something and it’s stuck at input()… hard to say)
I personally would install ruff and run “ruff check yourfile.py” and then later “ruff check --select=ALL yourfile.py” and read about everything it complains about.
Google the error codes and find the description and discussion of each and why it is complaining, sometimes they’re not a big deal, sometimes they are aha moments. Ruff has a page discussing each warning and error
A few podcasts I listen to have switched to calling their bluesky handles out instead of their twitter handles in their outros. I’ll probably install it and delete ex/twitter when I get an invite.
He also shrieked about bots, and now he parades his own around.


I’m not familiar with code.golf but I wonder how whitespace is handled? I find python is very concise anyway, but I wonder how the white space is counted (single tab, four spaces for black, etc).

FWIW the Play Store segments star ratings by device and software level. So everyone is probably going to see something different.


Leverage for what purpose? To fix reddit? Let reddit die or not die.
Reddit has always come after mirrors and they will easily get courts to take down the instances. Don’t forget that prior to the API change they came after pushshift.
Additionally, anyone mirroring reddit on the moral basis that the content is owned by the creators and reddit is an exploitative rentseeker, has an obligation to not become a rentseeker themselves. This means things like ensuring that content that users voluntarily delete is also deleted in the mirrors. Reddit in fact had a large battle with pushshift about this years ago such that pushshift supposedly now only keeps history of moderator and admin edits. I agree with that ethically.
And in many cases you may be legally required to do this. To be clear Reddit made pushshift change to respecting user delete requests because of legal exposure and compliance risks.
Not to mention that you don’t really know that anyone intends their content to be mirrored on sites they do not use. Particularly now that Reddit seems to be forcing private subreddits to be open. There’s no moral high ground for doing this.


I don’t like the idea. It seems like those fake websites that scrape stackoverflow and SEO to ruin Google search. Avoiding those sites are among the reasons people type “reddit” into searches. People want authentic interactions and I think mirroring reddit into Fediverse lacks authenticity and undermines its authenticity. Content here should be from people who are here.
If someone wants to assimilate content from reddit into something new and post it here that’s good. That means the person is here and can be interacted with.
If someone wants to repost their own content here, that’s also fine. They are here to interact with.
I just really think it’s a bad idea to deliberately build a ghost town and think people will move in.


I’m left unsure whether DBMS is fun sex for dyslexics, or BSDM is a dyslexic database.
Some I have enjoyed and learned from are:
This is the sort of superficial dismissal I was referring to.
“There are no safety issues because you can plead your case publically and incite a mob!” isn’t exactly as trust-inspiring as you seem to believe.