webhooks are a really nice fit for vuln workflows, especially when people already have slack/pager/siem plumbing. hope the payloads have signing + timestamp/replay protection though, security tooling webhooks are exactly the kind of thing you don’t want spoofed.

webhooks are a really nice fit for this kind of workflow. i’d want signing/verification and some payload filtering pretty early though, otherwise every downstream secops tool ends up doing its own messy trust checks.

webhooks are the bit i’d use right away. getting vuln reports into slack/opsgenie/whatever beats another inbox rule nobody looks at, and the local exploit hazard api sounds pretty handy for cutting through the usual cve feed noise.

webhook notifications are gonna be super useful for vuln triage workflows. the local exploit hazard API is the part i’d poke at first though, feels like it could help cut through a lot of noisy CVE queues.

webhooks are a pretty big quality of life thing if your team already lives in Slack, Matrix, or a ticket queue. the local exploit hazard API sounds like the really useful bit though, since prioritizing vuln noise is usually where the pain is.

webhooks are the part i’d probably use right away. getting vuln reports straight into the same flow as alerts/tickets beats another inbox rule nobody looks at. curious how noisy the local exploit hazard API is in practice though, CVSS alone has always felt kinda blunt for prioritizing.

webhooks are a really nice add for this. email-only vuln alerts always end up buried, but pushing them straight into an ops queue or incident channel makes the data way more usable. curious to try the local exploit hazard API too, prioritization is still the annoying part.