

Can you (or someone) explain like I’m 5?


Can you (or someone) explain like I’m 5?


Is having an algo off the table? Xcancel doesn’t give you a feed, just searches. coomer mostly has women on it, do you happen to know of any focused on men?
thanks anyways, though. appreciate it.


What does Privacy@lemmy exist for?


I responded to the aspects of your argument that weren’t personal attacks. Personal attacks, yes, I am not interested in.
‘‘Industry standard’’ doesn’t mean anything. Government surveillance and everything this sub stands against is ‘‘industry standard’’. Just because everyone’s doing it doesn’t mean it’s a good thing.
I ‘‘singled out’’ Proton because it was the VPN I used the most prior. I’m not sure why that’s a problem.
Are you able to discuss things based on criticisms of logical reasoning and evidence, or are you going to continue to respond with personal attacks? I am open to critique.


The concern is primarily about not letting Israel have my data; payments towards them isn’t. What would you recommend in terms of layering security? I am currently degoogling, getting rid of Meta apps, and switching from american for-profit socials to FOSS alternatives.


To summarize, are you saying your trust in Mullvad’s ability to safely host in Israel comes from its decision to relinquish prized features to resist interpol searches?


I’ve only recently started looking into privacy so much of it goes over my head.
I don’t use mails for communication, but I’d just like to limit the amount of information/tracking that corporate overlords can collect of me if I can help it (subscriptions mostly and the demographic information they imply, I suppose).


Just because mullvad and most other VPNs do something, doesn’t mean it’s good.
Israel is known for a level of surveillance that most other countries aren’t.
The rest of what you’ve said is just ad hominem I’m not interested in.


Unideal? Yes
Does that mean I stop trying altogether to minimize surveillance? No.


Mullvad has Israeli servers.
Thanks for the other reccs though!


It’s not about genocide.
It’s about surveillance, which is fully legal in Israel.
There are other regions that don’t conduct surveillance of all VPNs and comms. That’s better.


It’s not operating in a bad country that makes the vpn bad, but the fact that the country is known for its surveillance of VPNs there that makes it bad.


Mullvad doing something — even if it’s reknown — doesn’t automatically make it’s actions good.
Israel conducts surveillance of any VPN communications of any that exist in the region. This is fully legal there. This is a threat to privacy. You’d need to let me know how that isn’t the case, not that X or Y company also hosts a server in the region.
Re: mail, not looking for perfect, just better than Gmail, ideally FOSS.


I think mullvad has a server in Israel too


Why is it BS?
I did my research, I wanted community feedback for things I may have missed.


The observable behavior is the fact that Israel allows it’s communication and intelligence agencies complete legal access to access and monitor any info out of VPNs and other digital social info/comms.
That’s been sourced; Israel is known for its surveillance. I’m not sure why that’s so controversial.
This isn’t fear-mongering, this isn’t assumption.


It’s not about supporting genocide that I’m concerned about over here per se (though it’s obviously not a good look), it’s the fact that the region is known for surveillance through any comms that enter it.
Unrelated, but yes, people against genocide literally boycott any businesses that operate in Israel, including McDonalds. BDS movement, for example.


They don’t need to be materially linked; they are digitally linked. Israel allows it’s communication and intelligence agencies complete legal access to any communications through VPNs that operate in it’s area.
I don’t want that surveillance.


Thank you. I’m baffled by how complacent people are to Israel’s involvement.
They don’t necessarily need to oppose the genocide but just not host any servers in the area (since that means they’ve access to it).
My primary concern was that last bit you wrote: e2ee doesn’t necessarily guarantee anything; corporate overlords like Meta has abused it and iirc the British government is starting to fuck with e2ee too.
Does e2ee even mean anything anymore?