Talentless Sculptor

Yupp. No other culture has engaged in slavery ever. Hang on…

If the prophet is supposed to have infallible morals, they can’t be time sensitive.

Note that I am taking a page out of your book now by not responding to your questions.

She is not a historian. She is a former child actor turned journalist, think tank contributor and Islam romantic.

You are quoting a 13 year old guardian article written by Myrian Francois “In 2003, at the age of 21, François became a Muslim after graduating from Cambridge. At the time, she was a sceptical Roman Catholic. She rejects the use of the words “convert” and “revert” as “exclusionary”, describing herself as “just Muslim”.[51]” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myriam_François#Personal_life

She also disregards the narration of Aisha herself in Sahih Muslim and Sahih Al Bukhari - Both narrations claiming that she was 6 when she married the Prophet and 9 when the marriage was consummated.

Are you a moral relativist?

I’m not sure you’d even call it flawed morals if their moral beliefs were compatible with the society they lived in.

This is moral relativism. Are you as, I have to assume, a Muslim also a moral relativist? Was the Prophet right to have sex with a child then because it was socially acceptable at the time, or will it always be right to have sex with a child because the Prophet is the most moral person ever to have lived and his morals will never be wrong?

So you are saying that the authors of the Quran and the Prophet whom inspired them to write, had flawed morals?