The tech and the goal of the tech is of increasing importance IMHO. It is cheap. It seems to work as intended. I hope it gets more widespread adoption and growth as I notice big tech has become even more violently invasive using the AI usage data of their customers.
But if the client device/phone is not secure enough against invasive taking into possession of everything you do like Apple/Alphabet/Huawei etc. backdoored OSs then I would start with that. GrapheneOS for example.
Also, a local database the os uses to tie its various functions together is literally how it’s marketed. I havent been able to investigate this because my lemmy time has been dominated by explaining thermodynamics and making personalized shopping recommendations but I imagine this is part of the “apple ai” slider.
The last little bit of the linked article really gives the lie up. “Your logs are a secret sleep schedule”. Yeah. A graphene phone with even just normal device logs will function the same way.
Pardon the glib tone but I’m often worried about exhibiting symptoms of paranoid delusions or schizophrenic behavior simply because it’s easy to slide into acting like a tinfoil hatter when you pay attention to computer security but articles like this really help make me feel normal. These sources need to be read with the utmost scrutiny because they can’t even be assed to proofread their ai generated article for consistency and clarity. If I found some terrifying hidden database inside a piece of software and made the decision to release those findings using an llm generated document I’d at least check to make sure it doesn’t say something stupid at the beginning and end.
‘Not a backdoor’ by what definition? Because it depends. Snowden calls it a backdoor.
Quote the ‘something stupid’ or anything. The way you put zero (based) arguments and zero objectivity in your reply tells solely a picture about your mood and self-esteem.
I’m gonna respond to your requests that I copy and paste parts of the article you linked to me and respond directly to them in a way that’s clearer later on when I have a little more time.
But lay off the personal attacks. I haven’t said a single negative thing about you and it only makes people reading this exchange take your ideas less seriously. Which I think does them a disservice because there’s a level of ears pricked up awareness you clearly exhibit that people ought to emulate.
The tech and the goal of the tech is of increasing importance IMHO. It is cheap. It seems to work as intended. I hope it gets more widespread adoption and growth as I notice big tech has become even more violently invasive using the AI usage data of their customers.
But if the client device/phone is not secure enough against invasive taking into possession of everything you do like Apple/Alphabet/Huawei etc. backdoored OSs then I would start with that. GrapheneOS for example.
As a daily user of both graphene and ios I’m interested to see evidence of a backdoor in ios.
https://8rank.ai/game/apple-intelligence-personal-knowledge-graph
Not a backdoor.
Also, a local database the os uses to tie its various functions together is literally how it’s marketed. I havent been able to investigate this because my lemmy time has been dominated by explaining thermodynamics and making personalized shopping recommendations but I imagine this is part of the “apple ai” slider.
The last little bit of the linked article really gives the lie up. “Your logs are a secret sleep schedule”. Yeah. A graphene phone with even just normal device logs will function the same way.
Pardon the glib tone but I’m often worried about exhibiting symptoms of paranoid delusions or schizophrenic behavior simply because it’s easy to slide into acting like a tinfoil hatter when you pay attention to computer security but articles like this really help make me feel normal. These sources need to be read with the utmost scrutiny because they can’t even be assed to proofread their ai generated article for consistency and clarity. If I found some terrifying hidden database inside a piece of software and made the decision to release those findings using an llm generated document I’d at least check to make sure it doesn’t say something stupid at the beginning and end.
‘Not a backdoor’ by what definition? Because it depends. Snowden calls it a backdoor.
Quote the ‘something stupid’ or anything. The way you put zero (based) arguments and zero objectivity in your reply tells solely a picture about your mood and self-esteem.
Or how to say nothing with everything, but…
What a waste of time.
I’m gonna respond to your requests that I copy and paste parts of the article you linked to me and respond directly to them in a way that’s clearer later on when I have a little more time.
But lay off the personal attacks. I haven’t said a single negative thing about you and it only makes people reading this exchange take your ideas less seriously. Which I think does them a disservice because there’s a level of ears pricked up awareness you clearly exhibit that people ought to emulate.