What search engine is currently showing the most useful results? What other tricks do we have aside of adding “reddit” or whatever internet community to the results?

    • const_void@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      3 years ago

      Definitely. So many searches lately will return results that only partially match the search terms. What’s even the point of searching if you’re just going to show a bunch of unrelated results?

      • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        I hate that so much

        Sorry, looks like you searched for stuff that isn’t really popular. How about these unrelated Facebook and Pintrest links instead?

    • Contingencyfork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      I actually prefer Google for shopping. Just turn off your adblocker, search for a particular item you want to buy and bam your first 3 to 4 pages are retailers pushing the product with their prices listed (with a touch of scam websites that I presume pay for advertising). Anything else I add ‘Reddit’ or just watch a few YouTube videos depending on what kind of answers I’m looking for

  • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 years ago

    More and more I have been using the Bing “chat” search. It does a search, filters through the results and summarizes the answer with links to the sites it found them on.

    For certain types of search it is a huge time saver of scrolling through results to find answers on various pages.

    Over all bing search it self isn’t bad.

    • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      I recently switched to Bing after years of disappointment from Google and months of disappointment from DDG. Bing is pretty disappointing too, but less so, so far. I tried to use the chat feature a couple of days ago, but it said I have to download the app. Nah… fuck these tech companies and their apps.

      • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        The “preview” for the chat feature requires the app or edge on desktop currently but I do find myself turning to it every time I get frustrated with a google search these days.

        Less disappointing is probably the best discrimination as you said.

    • erogenouswarzone@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      I really want to like DuckDuckGo, but the results are never right. I always end up going back to Google. But I’m a professional programmer, so it might be different for me.

    • sock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      i gotta use duck duck go on my work laptop. no sugarcoat its dogshit google is still better even tho google is getting worse

  • forgotmylastusername@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 years ago

    For a brief moment in time search engines were perfected. Then they veered off course. All of them did. Why though.

    Remember when you could list vaguely some words related an obscure movie to Google. Then it would tell you the movie you’re thinking of. That’s been nerfed.

    Tangentially related. What’s the deal with search engines of online stores. It’s like they aren’t even search engines at all. They’re doing nothing more than showing me products/sellers they want me to buy from. Digikey lets you drill down to precise specification filters. I wish all search engines could be like that.

  • Tygr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 years ago

    Topics like this remind me of the pre-Google era. If Google can’t see the damage they’ve done, they deserve to vanish like the ones they’ve vanished in the early years.

  • zemon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    I use Swisscows and Metager, and usually find what I need, if I don’t I retry the query with Startpage.

  • CuriousGoo@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    I am not sure whether DDG or SearX results are optimised by someone, but it is different from what I would see on Google for a given topic.

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      DDG seems to get most of their results from Bing, but they do tweak it a bit themselves. From the link:

      Most of our search result pages feature one or more Instant Answers. To deliver Instant Answers on specific topics, DuckDuckGo leverages many sources, including specialized sources like Sportradar and crowd-sourced sites like Wikipedia. We also maintain our own crawler (DuckDuckBot) and many indexes to support our results. Of course, we have more traditional links and images in our search results too, which we largely source from Bing. Our focus is synthesizing all these sources to create a superior search experience.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Probably the new Google search that uses Bard. It’s not public yet, but you can ask for access.

    Edit: It’s currently referred to as “generative search”, and you can use it on Android if you sign up for the beta version of the app on the play store.