• mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    Genuinely surprised it’s even opt-out.

    These companies train on Disney DVDs. Permission is not a factor. Training is transformative use, as much for counting letter frequency as for building a chatbot that can sort of code.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      no, officer, you misunderstand! I’m not pirating this movie, I’m just training my intelligence on it! it is transformative use, see, I can now write you this summary!

        • Wiz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I would say this is a gray area of law. It hasn’t been tested yet. There are a few factors in determining “fair use”. One of those factors is commercialization, which could nullify fair use. Another is the amount you’re using.

          • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Commercial parody is commonplace fair use. If it surpasses the original… oh well.

            The amount being used becomes negligible as the corpus grows. Filtering a billion webpages into one gigabyte means their average contribution is one byte. Play with the numbers all you like, it’s gonna come out to less than a paragraph.

            If we went full copyright maximalist, and criminally banned using anything but public-domain / BSD / CC0 works, the commercial impact would not be much different. The technology itself shifts the economics of text, images, video, and code.