Other than your carrier give it for free or cheap, I don’t really see the reason why should you buy new phone. I’ve been using Redmi Note 9 for past 3 years and recently got my had on Poco F5. I don’t see the point of my ‘upgrade’. I sold it and come back to my Note 9. Gaming? Most of them are p2w or microtransaction garbage or just gimped version of its PC/Console counterpart. I mean, $400 still get you PS4, TV and Switch if you don’t mind buying used. At least here where I live. Storage? Dude, newer phone wont even let you have SD Card. Features? Well, all I see is newer phones take more features than it adds. Headphone jack, more ads, and repairability are to name a few. Battery? Just replace them. However, my Note 9 still get through day with one 80% charge in the dawn. Which takes 1 hour.

I am genuinely curious why newer phone always selling like hot cakes. Since there’s virtually no difference between 4gb of RAM and 12gb of RAM, or 12mp camera and 100mp camera on phone.

  • dystop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    I mean, most of the population isn’t buying a new phone every year, it’s just that there are enough people using phones in general that at any given time there are people buying new models. It’s the same reason why there are people buying cars every year.

    I personally use my phones for about 3 years. Sometimes up to 4, but usually year 3-4 is when the battery degradation gets so horribly bad and performance stutters so much that I figure if I’m going to do a full reset and buy a new battery and all that, I might as well get a new phone.

    • godofpainTR@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      Not charging my old phone to 100%, rather to 85% or 90% has helped with battery longevity immensely. After almost 5 years in use, accubattery still shows 80% battery health, and even if that’s not accurate, it still lasts quite a while. The SD625 that phone had was very sluggish though, so in the end I still replaced it

      • dystop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 years ago

        I used to do that, but it was a chore to keep monitoring my battery life. I wish there were a “charge phone to 80% and stop” option.

        • normalmighty@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          There are apps you can install to manage it for you on android, automatically cutting off charging when a given percentage is reached.

        • godofpainTR@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          My samsung has the feature built in, but on that old phone I rooted and installed Advanced Charge Controller. (Not feasible for most people i know)

          • Metallibus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            I don’t know why Google hasn’t put this feature directly into Android. It’s honestly one of the biggest pushes away from Pixel devices for me and it’s absolutely silly.

  • M-Reimer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    The only real issue are updates. After just 3 years my previous phone didn’t get any security updates and I had to get new hardware. I actually liked my previous phone more than my current one. But it is how it is.

    • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      That’s the reason why I switched to iPhone after many years of Android, security updates are vital nowadays with all the sensitive data and apps we use on our phones, Apple is the only one that guarantees al least 5 years, iPhones are not too expensive if you don’t buy the latest models and I’d rather avoid supporting companies that don’t understand the importance of security.

      • Hector_McG@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        I have just done the same.

        Although Google are now promising 5 years of support for Pixel phones, Pixel phones are not a core business for Google, and as they have shown many times, Google will end projects at the drop of a hat with no regard for their customers.

        There are secondary Android companies like Samsung that promise long term security updates, but are always behind the publishing curve compared to Google. This means that malicious actors have the opportunity to study Google’s published updates to reverse engineer cracks that they then exploit.

        The current Android security update model is inherently insecure due to this issue. Until manufacturers are forced to update in a timely manner ( by which I mean simultaneously with Google) I won’t buy another Android phone.

      • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.mlBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        You are wrong. Android decouples its updation from “system update” and does not do updaes the way Apple does. Play Store, system apps and third party apps can continue to be updated years after official OEM EOL has been reached. You cannot use App Store or install or update any apps after 5 years of iPhone, but you can install and upgrade apps in an Android 5.0 device (8 years) or Android 7.0 device (6 years) long after EOL has been reached.

        Moreover…

        * Asus has now increased security updates to 4 years for its Zenfone 10.

      • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Pixel actually guarantees 5 years now and if you put GrapheneOS on it, then you’ll have one of the most private and secure operating systems available

        • dzervas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          just a side note for graphene: i have the feeling that it’s not for everyone. “too much” security tends to get in the UX way

          • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            Chances are if you know how to use an Android, using Graphene isn’t too much harder. You can still download from the play store and run apps like normal. If you’re reading this post then you probably have the technical knowhow to plug your phone into the computer and press the start button.

            Fair point with not being for everybody though, I wouldn’t be comfortable giving it to my non-techy family and friends. You do have a fair point.

            • rtevans@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              I’ve been running GrapheneOS on my Pixel 3 for three years and I have few complaints. I still cant figure out how to get automatic updates to work in Android 13 with the Neo or Droidify stores but atleast the stock GOS apps auto update. BTW, to clarify what you said, we have to use the Aurora app to download from Google Play Store.

              You’re right it’s not for most people. Not having Google services installed might be a major blow for people who have become accustomed to the conveniences they provide. I just use a separate vanilla Pixel for Google services if I need them, but the phone with my SIM card is the one with GrapheneOS.

      • ConditionOverload@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Pixel and Samsung also have 5 years of updates promised. And more phones are giving at least 3 years. I don’t think most people nowadays are hanging onto their 5 year old phones. Most everyone switches phones every 2 or 3 years.

        • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          I’m a fringe case then lol, I keep them until they actually break, they do last 4-5 years for me, sometimes more, I don’t make intense use of my phone, I much prefer using my PC for basically everything.

    • hunt4peas@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      That’s why I installed custom ROM on my Redmi Note 3 and used it for 4.5y until the battery swole.

    • Nezuh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      I hope I dont jinx myself with this but I dont think security updates at the OS level are that important nowadays.

  • Pap3r@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 years ago

    I feel like when I was younger and phone tech was changing a lot in the early days of the iOS and Android the difference even 1 year made was sometimes huge. Nowadays it’s much more incremental. A slight processor boost here, a couple GB of Ram there. I think a large part as to why that is is two things.

    One, the tech has stagnated to some degree. Innovation doesn’t exactly sell a phone to regular non tech folks, a stable “don’t have to think about it” experience is what most people are after.

    Two, a lot more issues with the cell phone platform are solved with software rather than throwing around more powerful hardware.

    All that being said when I was younger I loved the idea of bleeding edge tech in my pocket, I upgraded all the time. The appeal was more customization at a lesser cost to performance, I wanted all the bells and whistles and less of the jank that came with it. I’m a little older now and lean much more towards the “give me something that works and doesn’t crash for the 10 minutes I have to look at my phone” club.

    For those that upgrade to the latest iPhone/Pixel every year no matter what, I chalk that up to lots of expendable funds. It doesn’t appeal to me any more but I can also recognize that there are probably plenty of people out there now, like I was 10 years ago, so it could also be a general interest in the tech and how the bleeding edge keeps pushing for faster, more efficient technology.

    • axtualdave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      I’ll pile on with a “Yup!”

      While I fell into a pattern where I intend to upgrade every 2 years maybe 5 or 6 years ago, I’ve noticed in that same time frame that both the cost of new devices has gone up significantly and the durability of those devices has dropped.

      I’m very easy on my phones. They spend a vast majority of their time on my desk, or plugged into my car. I’m old and boring enough that “going out” involves sitting down at a table at a nice dinner with friends and then going home. That said, the battery life on my phones starts to degrade after about a year. Various flaws start to creep up in the device. I’ve already had to replace the screen on my Pixel 7 Pro once – though, to be fair, it took a tumble from the couch onto a hardwood floor, but even that, really, shouldn’t turn the screen non-functional.

      It’s disappointing to see that planned obsolescence rearing its head.

      • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Pixels have extremely thin screens, apparently. I tried to get the battery replaced on an otherwise perfectly functioning Pixel a few years ago, but it ended up being cost prohibitive because replacing the battery also required replacing the screen which was “potato chip thin” according to the repair guy, and it was almost impossible to swap the battery without breaking it.

  • MixedUpMarbles@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 years ago

    There is a HUGE difference in 4 and 12 GB of ram if you’re using 20 different apps at once that are all running background tasks.

    The camera raw megapixel are of little significance these days but things like optical zoom or a larger sensor and aperture make a lot of difference.

    The main reason to upgrade otherwise is unsupported OS versions. you’ll stop getting security updates leaving your phone vulnerable to attack.

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.mlBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      4 GB is not sufficient. Glad to have bought a 6 GB RAM device 4 years ago. 6-8 GB RAM is more than sufficient, 12 is overkill. There is some device now even with 24 GB RAM.

  • FrankTheHealer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Vanity, marketing and buying shit unnecessarily.

    I have a Fairphone 3 that I got in January 2020. Its a great device. I want to using it daily for between 5 to 10 years. And I have no doubt it will do that.

    Meanwhile my brother has bought 3 Samsung devices in that time. And each one still works fine. He doesn’t need a new phone each time but he will still insist on it.

      • FrankTheHealer@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        The camera on the Fairphone 3 is only okay. But there is an upgraded camera module you can buy from Fairphone.

        I’m not much of a photographer so it doesn’t bother me. But if you take a lot of pictures, it’s something to keep in mind.

  • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    The world around you uses Instagram daily. They do need a better camera and all the AI photo enhancement filters. Plus, consumerism, you know.

    Other than that, there’s no technical reason to buy anything better than what flafhsips were a few years back. I have one and it’s constantly underutilized.

    I mean, maybe 5G or wifi 6 could be a reason to migrate.

  • AtheistAndroid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Status symbol. That, and many people are horrible with their devices. They drop them and scratch them, crack the screen, chip them.

    They abuse them and load them with tons of apps. Fill up the phone with videos and photos. The battery holds less of a charge because many people use their phones as computers and will constantly be cycling it dead 3 times a day or more.

    Apps update and use more resources and space. They could just clean up their phone, do a reset, and have a case for protection but choose not to and just buy a new one.

    It’s stupid I agree

  • oxjox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 years ago

    It used to be that a new phone came with a relatively substantial new feature set. People have become accustomed to this and businesses have been built around this. At this point, it’s mostly about consumerism.

    I’m still rocking an iPhone 12 Mini without the slightest hiccup as well as an original iPhone SE as my main music player. I used to be the person who got every new phone because there used to be such a jump in performance and hardware features. Now I have no reason to upgrade at all. Honestly, I’d love to get rid of my phone all together and just use an iPad, Apple Watch, and my camera and journal.

    • theragu40@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Yeah this is really it. The answer is that there used to be significant technical reasons to do so. Technology improved enough each year that last year’s phones were really showing age.

      At this point even basic phones are so fast and so feature rich that no one except niche groups needs anything faster than what came out several years ago. Everything basic like watching videos, maps, internet browsing, and messaging works perfectly fine on anything.

      So the reasons shifted to renewing battery life and OS updates. Which are both at least somewhat artificial since manufactures could easily implement longer updates or replaceable batteries.

    • Tak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      They could make the battery last 5+ years before degradation if they made the phones a bit thicker to get the same battery life with lithium iron phosphate cells instead of lithium ion cells. They also don’t turn into spicy pillows or catch fire really too if that means anything to you.

      I really don’t understand the obsession with having the thinnest possible phone but also selling $2,000 folding phones that are thick as hell.

  • onionbaggage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 years ago

    I just use my phone until it either breaks or can’t do what I want it to do.

    Since having kids they break more often.

  • Madbrad200@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 years ago

    I agree. I only replace my phone when it stops working.

    Battery life is decent for 3-4+ years nowadays.

  • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 years ago

    I buy used flagships.

    A 1.5 year old flagship costs the same as a brand new midrange phone, but is significantly better.

    I just got a S21 Ultra for cheaper than I would have paid for an A54. (Also Exynos is hot fucking garbage. I wanted to get away from Samsung altogether, but the price on this made sense and I has a snapdragon. Significantly better)

  • Go-On-A-Steam-Train@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 years ago

    I totally agree :) I’m S10 until the thing melts, I managed to replace the battery under warranty and plan to rock it as long as humanly possible.

    Headphone jack is a huge factor in that as I would not want to lose something I use every day, but also like you say, performance is fine! On top of that is the fact that I’m paying £8 a month for unlimited everything without a contract! :)

    I guess there used to be a night and day change, and people kind of still expect that from the next flagship each time they’re offered an upgrade?

    That said, these days the trends tend to steer into things I don’t use much, or improving what’s already good enough - its a good time to be on a budget I guess! :)

  • Electric_leprechaun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 years ago

    I was at work last week and two colleagues loaded on an apple update to their phones. Their phones slowed to a crawl and lost battery charge quickly through the day. The next thing I saw was one of them with the internet browser open putting his credit card details in to buy a new iPhone £650 gone just like that. iPhone users wouldn’t balk at expensive contracts or spending £600 quid on a new iPhone. It seems to me apple deliberately trash their phones and users accept it and upgrade to a newer model. I could understand if it was a cheap phone but jeeze crazy money for something with such a short lifespan. Would you buy a ln expensive TV if you thought it wouldn’t last you any more than a couple of years?

    • NaN@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Plenty of iPhone users rocking iOS 16 on the iPhone 8 (from 2017) with no trouble. For many iPhone users the longevity is one reason they use it. Others will always update to the latest and greatest.

      • Ecology8622@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Exactly. iPhones are one of the longest if not the longest supported phones. Having said that, there’s no convincing Android users and vice versa.