qaz@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agoWho cares about time complexitylemmy.worldimagemessage-square45linkfedilinkarrow-up1325arrow-down11
arrow-up1324arrow-down1imageWho cares about time complexitylemmy.worldqaz@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square45linkfedilink
minus-squaretrxxruraxvr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up24arrow-down1·1 year agoIIV would never be used. In Roman numerals at most one smaller unit can come in front of a larger one. The code doesn’t do any validation though.
minus-squareMirodir@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up14·1 year agoWhile it doesn’t say anything about IIV specifically, they sure got creative enough to sometimes subtract more than one of the smaller units from a larger one.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down6·1 year agoYes, that does demonstrate my point.
IIV becomes IIIII, hm?
IIV would never be used. In Roman numerals at most one smaller unit can come in front of a larger one. The code doesn’t do any validation though.
While it doesn’t say anything about IIV specifically, they sure got creative enough to sometimes subtract more than one of the smaller units from a larger one.
Yes, that does demonstrate my point.