• Patches@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Postgre is still better than MongoDB so I am okay with this.

    Every. Every single project. Who could have predicted our data would become relational?

    • UFO@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      100% accurate.

      As somebody reducing mongodb at work: postgres first would have saved so much trouble!

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      You might have be doing something wrong then. MongoDB handles relationships just fine, just because your data has relations doesn’t mean that it needs to be stored in tables. In fact, a graph database does relationships even better, but we don’t use neo4j for all our apps, do we?

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    I used Mongo and Postgres at my last job, then Postgres and various queues/nonrels for different services at the current one. I really, REALLY like the queryable JSON column type in Postgres. Not as in I use it for everything, but where it is actually called for, it’s extremely useful.

    • BaroqBard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I use Redshift right now and I would LOVE to have something nice and flexible like that. Come to think of it, some halfway reliable documentation would be nice too.