Single core, 32 bit CPU, can’t even do video playback on VLC. But it kinda works for some offline work, like text editing, and even emulation through zsnes! It’s crazy how Linux keeps old hardware like this running.

Thankfully though, this laptop CPU is upgradable, and so is the ram, so I’m planning on revitalizing and bringing this old Itautec to the 21st century 😄

        • whaleross@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          I remember expanding my Amiga with 512KB to 1MB Fast RAM and later going crazy with another two megabyte Slow RAM.

            • phantomwise@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              I remember when computers had no memory and the storage was on punch cards made from mammoth leather that we had to tan ourselves after spending our weekends hunting the mammoth with spears. Also we carved our code by hand on stone tablets. Young people these days have it easy.

      • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Lmao, I’ve ran Linux on an eeePC with 1GB RAM and 900MHz Intel Atom. Compiling gcc & glibc could take hours.

        Edit: RPi3 still got only 1GB, BeagleBone Black even got 512MB, don’t forget RPi0

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 months ago

    Hell yeah! Love seeing old hardware like this still running a modern OS.

    With Linux, if your hardware is a decade old, you’ve barely even reached middle-age.

    Meanwhile Windows 11 won’t even allow an official install on hardware that’s 4-5 years old.

    Long live Linux & FOSS ✊

  • answersplease77@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    thats my current laptop

    Edit: im exagerating but I really have 20-yr 32-bit Dell laptops running minimal debian linux. and my current laptop is 10+ yrs old Lenovo which I already replaced its screen, rams, keyboard, bluetooth, usb ports… and it’s still working flawlessly for daily tasks, video/music editing, coding and programming, internet browsing :D

  • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    Are you using systemd? Because 317 MB of RAM is really low for a normal Debian installation with XFce. At my mom’s 2 GB ram laptop, it uses 850 MB on a cold boot.

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      It is because it is 32 bit. You can run a 32 bit distro on your machine too if you really want.

      You can get a full Trinity desktop on Q4OS in 130 MB of RAM (32 bit edition).

      • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I don’t think the difference between 32bit and 64bit is 2x in memory sizes, it’s way less than that. I run Q4OS, it runs at 350 MBs here.

        • LeFantome@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Are you running Trinity or KDE?

          Not sure why I get so much less unless it is that. Or are you saying you run Trinity 64 bit?

          I agree that 32 bit is not often going to be 50% less in practice. Sometimes I think we should be running 64 bit kernels with 32 bit userland.

          • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Trinity of course. That’s the point of low end computing with Q4OS. :)

  • gjoel@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    I suspect my first Linux ran on an 80mhz AMD K6. I did however also run it on a retired dual core UltraSPARC some years later I had somehow gotten my hands on. It might have been faster, but at that time it sure felt slow. And it sounded like a train passing through when it was on. In retrospect installing Gentoo on it was an optimistic endeavour.

    • Hule@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ackshually… I also had an AMD K5 with Performance Rating 100.

      K6 was 166 MHz and up, Pentium II competitor.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    If Minix counts, I got it running on a 286 some years ago. I don’t remember how much RAM it had, but it was very little.

  • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
    cake
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m planning on revitalizing and bringing this old Itautec to the 21st century

    I think it was born in the 21st century? From this it looks like the first Celeron M was in 2004, and the first at that clockspeed was 2005.

    Also, 2GB of RAM is plenty for many purposes - that’s more than any Raspberry Pi before the Pi 4 had!

    • merci3@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Actually… You’re right about the 21st century lmao. I just wanted an excuse to quote Metal Gear Solid

      Also, the issue is not ram itself, of course, 2GB is enough for lots of fun on Linux, it’s the CPU that’s killing me

  • piranhaconda@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    My 2011 MacBook pro is still chugging along thanks to Linux.

    I upgraded 4GB RAM to 16GB, upgraded the HDD to SSD, and replaced the CD drive with a second SSD. Sadly the screen is almost completely gone, occasionally intermittent, probably a cable gone bad, not sure, but the mini display port is working fine for an external monitor.

    • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      My girlfriend’s 2012 MacBook Pro is also running Fedora like a beast with its upgraded 16GB or Ram and its SSD.

      It’s great that old hardware gets a bew chance to shine!

      • LeFantome@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I found my people.

        I have Linux on a 2009 and 2012 MacBook Pro and 2013 and 2017 MacBook Airs.

        The 2009 is getting a bit sluggish but for regular stuff, they all work great. We even played a Steam game on the 2012 earlier today (not AAA obviously).

        All Chimera Linux.

    • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Did the same thing with my Thinkpad, 1 tb SSD, 20gb ram (16 gig stick and 4 soldered on) and an upgrade wifi card. Best computer I’ve ever had

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Stories from the “good” old days running Linux on a 386 machine with 4 MB or less of memory aside, in the present day it’s still perfectly normal to run Linux on a much weaker machine as a server - you can just rent a the cheapest VPS you can find (which nowadays will have 128 MB, maybe 256MB, and definitelly only give you a single core) and install it there.

    Of course, it won’t be something with X-Windows or Wayland, much less stuff like LibreOffice.

    I think the server distribution of Ubunto might fit such a VPS, though there are server-specific Linux distros that will for sure fit and if everything fails TinyCore Linux will fit in a potato.

    I current have a server like that using AlmaLinux on a VPS with less than 1GB in memory, which is used only as a Git repository and that machine is overkill for it (it’s the lowest end VPS with enough storage space for a Git repository big enough for the projects I’m working on, so judging by the server management interface and linux meminfo, that machine’s CPU power and memory are in practice far more than needed).

    If you’re willing to live with a command line interface, you can run Linux on $50 worth of hardware.

    • vvvvv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      only give you a single core

      And boy would that core be shitty and over-provisioned.

  • rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Those are better specs than what I used throughout college (an Asus Eee PC running Debian with Xfce and Openbox). Not a powerful machine, but I absolutely loved that thing.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Are we competing again?

    I’m proud to be setting up a rhel10 desktop, as it’ll be the first time I ran Linux as a desktop in 30 years of a Linux/Unix career.

    To rephrase: I ran XFree86 on a 4mb i386 machine 30 years ago.

    What do I win?

    • merci3@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I didnt have the intention to compete, was just proud of seeing this 2007 laptop running a modern OS again!