cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 8 months agoJavaScriptlemmy.mlimagemessage-square92linkfedilinkarrow-up1848arrow-down113
arrow-up1835arrow-down1imageJavaScriptlemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 8 months agomessage-square92linkfedilink
minus-squarecapybara@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down6·8 months agoThis is fair enough from an idealistic view. In practice, you don’t want your entire website to shit itself because of a potentially insignificant error.
minus-squareJankatarch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·8 months agoIn practice runtime errors are a bitch to find and fix.
minus-squarecapybara@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·8 months agoFair enough. This is why people prefer typescript
minus-squarerandom8847@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·8 months agoI’d rather have my website shit itself than have silent difficult to find errors.
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·8 months agoLook! I bought this for free on capybaras website, there’s a glitch! capybara: at least it didn’t throw an error. / jk 😁
minus-squarecapybara@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down5·8 months agoUse typescript if you’re paranoid about this
This is fair enough from an idealistic view. In practice, you don’t want your entire website to shit itself because of a potentially insignificant error.
In practice runtime errors are a bitch to find and fix.
Fair enough. This is why people prefer typescript
I’d rather have my website shit itself than have silent difficult to find errors.
Use typescript
Look! I bought this for free on capybaras website, there’s a glitch!
capybara: at least it didn’t throw an error.
/ jk 😁
Use typescript if you’re paranoid about this