• Termight@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 year ago

    “The early Internet’s dissociative opportunities actually encouraged me and those of my generation to change our most deeply held opinions, instead of just digging in and defending them when challenged. This ability to reinvent ourselves meant that we never had to close our minds by picking sides, or close ranks out of fear of doing irreparable harm to our reputations. Mistakes that were swiftly punished but swiftly rectified allowed both the community and the “offender” to move on. To me, and to many, this felt like freedom.” ~ Permanent Record, Snowden.

    • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lol i really cringed at that phrasing about “good people doing bad things”. Theyre literally fascists doing fascism to advance their interests, it really doesn’t matter if they are vegan and have dogs.

      • Niquarl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Je was a contractor for the NSA, sis you think he was going to say anything different?

    • FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      What is your definition of Fascist, here?

      It seems to get tossed around at everything, these days. Not a fan if the NSA either, nor the Patriot Act, either.

        • INeedMana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          fascism is capitalism showing its teeth, like what trump is doing more overtly now

          AFAIK that is not the definition of fascism

          But I’ve seen a TikTok of someone who is studying politcal doctrines (IDR if their level was Major or PHD) and what is currently going on was ticking off all the boxes

  • khannie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My response to this is usually “Do you have curtains?”

    Very late edit: I have found it very effective. It causes pause for thought because everyone values privacy, they just find it hard to picture themselves needing it. Curtains.

  • JLock17@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    One of the things I warn people about privacy is that it’s not about what they might find, it’s about what they might pretend to find.

    Plenty of dirty cops plant evidence. Who’s to say they don’t like someone and keep a flash drive full of Cheese Pizza to plant on their computer. Usually that kind of logic gets people on board more easily.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    He misattributes that quote

    https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1558

    You will find the quote in this book that predates Nazi Germany

    Not merely was my own mail opened, but the mail of all my relatives and friends—people residing in places as far apart as California and Florida. I recall the bland smile of a government official to whom I complained about this matter: “If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear.”

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Snowden is a brave guy in some ways, but even in spite of his leaks, he’s remained a naive US-supremacist libertarian, who evangangelizes tech over political action, defends the OTF, silicon valley, and US-DoD funded crypto tools and privacy apps.

      The lesson of 2013 is not that the NSA is evil. It’s that the path is dangerous. The network path is something that we need to help users get across safely. Our job as technologists, our job as engineers, our job as anybody who cares about the internet in any way, who has any kind of personal or commercial involvement is literally to armor the user, to protect the user and to make it that they can get from one end of the path to the other safely without interference,” he told an auditorium filled with the world’s foremost computer and network engineers at a 2015 meeting of the Internet Engineering Task Force in Prague. He reaffirmed his view a year later at Fusion’s 2016 Real Future Fair in Oakland, California. “If you want to build a better future, you’re going to have to do it yourself. Politics will take us only so far and if history is any guide, they are the least reliable means of achieving the effective change.… They’re not gonna jump up and protect your rights,” he said. “Technology works differently than law. Technology knows no jurisdiction.”

  • Matt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    The answer to that Reddit post is to delete your account on Reddit.

  • ObsidianZed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    We desperately need a constitutional right to privacy, but I doubt that will happen in my or our country’s lifetime.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which country? Plenty of countries have at least a nominal right to privacy, but it doesn’t end up meaning much when US companies own your country’s communications platforms.

    • Termight@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Weird how Edward Snowden is basically a Boddhisatwa and Julian Assange

      Defining someone a Bodhisattva is complex. Snowden & Assange acted with potential benefit & harm. True Bodhisattvas act from pure compassion & wisdom, embodying equanimity. Their actions offer reflection on truth & consequences.

        • Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zoneBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exposing truth can often get people killed, especially if the liars are in the government, want to kill witnesses or rats, or at least make their lives hell for betraying the state. Depending on the severity, livelihoods are often at stake. That’s why very few people engage in whistleblowing. They’re aware that it will not get better for them.

        • Termight@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Where is the harm?

          Snowden’s disclosures, while aiming for transparency, risked national security, compromised sources, strained relations, & potentially enabled misuse of info. Buddhist principles emphasize avoiding harm & maintaining order, aspects potentially impacted by his actions. A balanced view acknowledges both benefit & risk.

          • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            1 year ago

            Maintaining order in this context would mean letting some people harm other people’s privacy though.

            • Termight@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Maintaining order in this context would mean letting some people harm other people’s privacy though.

              You’re right to question “order” at the expense of privacy. Buddhist principles highlight interdependence & ethical action. Security shouldn’t erode fundamental rights. Privacy & security are interconnected, not opposing forces.

    • gaja@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Retaliation for exposing the truth, likely to never speak the full truth again.

  • HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have “nothing to hide” but I STILL like privacy tyvm. Hence I’ll shit in public with the stall door closed, and not disclose my wank schedule on Facebook

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck me, the last part hit me HARD. I won’t get into the details why because it is painful for me to talk about it.

    • Libra00@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m gonna guess a whole lot of flustered backpedaling amounting to not a lot of anything, but I’m willing to be surprised if someone wants to dig up the video.

      • jwt@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think this image shows her being in a position to backpedal from. I see her providing him with a platform to counter some points that were made elsewhere; she has not necessarily taken a position one way or the other.

        • Libra00@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I meant backpedaling in the journalistic way of ‘Oh you seem to actually know more about what you’re talking about than I do and have a lot to say on the subject, I should, uh, redirect to a different topic where I can catch you out for that sick sound bite’ or whatever. Maybe that’s not what was going on in that interview, Iono, I haven’t seen it.