• asudox@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It means nothing. DNT is being ignored by most websites anyway and is also a fingerprinting metric.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The DNT flag amounted to the equivalent of a digital pinky swear from website operators. Oh they still tracked you? That’s too bad… South Park’s rubbing nipples meme

  • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    DNT didn’t do shit anyway. If you’re relying upon corporations like Google to not track you just because you asked nicely, then you have a very naive view of how much they actually give a shit about your wishes.

  • Y5QcY2Cu9@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is one website, that I know of, that does not ignore DNT: geizhals. Also in germany you cannot ignore DNT by law (most still do).

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They probably were paid to change the terminology, it doesn’t look good for any website when you have the browser saying copy without tracking the URL that’s copied is half the size

        • techfox@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t quite get what changing the name would achieve in this scenario? I might be misunderstanding what you mean though. That being said, this was a suggested change 2 months ago within the community, so very unlikely to be any motivation behind it other than genuine change to clarify the feature. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1924493

          • Pika@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Changes it to a more friendlier term, it saying copy without tracking is acknowledging that the site is using tracking data, where would the new terminology if you don’t know what those parameters are then you just think it’s a shorter link.

            Neither changes the fact that it’s happening in the first place, but one is directly addressing the elephant in the room where one is hiding under the rug

            That being said reading that link, I do agree with some of the complaints that they have, but I still think it should have remained the same because that’s exactly what the system does. It best attempts to remove tracking information from the URI