• Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hot take: there is nothing a human can do on the surface of a planet or moon that warrants the absurd weight required to send a human there, keep them alive and bring them back.

      • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I completely agree, with one exception: Inspiring other humans.

        Example: Chang’e 6 was a successful mission from a technological and scientific perspective, but I feel like the general public didn’t care that much. But when China land their first taikonaut on the lunar surface (something the US did over fifty years ago), I bet the general public will care a lot more.

    • The Bard in GreenA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      The opposite. I love crewed missions. Not a fan of underfunded NASA. Not a fan of wealth transfer to billionaires. Not a fan of cool science missions that could happen in my lifetime getting delayed decades.