𝜯𝐞𝐡 𝜝𝐚𝐦𝐬𝐤𝐢@lemmy.world to Atheism@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoBook Clubi.imgur.comimagemessage-square90linkfedilinkarrow-up1988arrow-down133
arrow-up1955arrow-down1imageBook Clubi.imgur.com𝜯𝐞𝐡 𝜝𝐚𝐦𝐬𝐤𝐢@lemmy.world to Atheism@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square90linkfedilink
minus-squareindex@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down40·2 years agoI don’t think commenting under a clickbait picture is the best way to have a serious discussion
minus-squareNuke_the_whales@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up23·2 years agoYou can’t have a serious discussion with a person who follows a millennia old book
minus-squareindex@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down8·2 years agoYou sound like someone who hasn’t read or study much
minus-squareNuke_the_whales@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoLol spelling errors aren’t a great way to try and play smart
minus-squareslickgoat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up21·2 years agoOh, and that’s what the other side is pursuing - a serious discussion? Spare us. The other side is out for blood. No discussion is detailed in Project 2025.
minus-squareindex@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down14·2 years agoI’m not sure what you are talking about is this post related to US politics?
minus-squareslickgoat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoIs US politics not related to this post? I mean, in any way?
minus-squareindex@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 years agoI’m pointing it out, same people seem not to realize it.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down11·2 years agoIf we swap the word “bible” for “lawbook” does your opinion change?
minus-squareexplodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 years agoIf we had it all active laws in one book, that would be a huge step in the right direction.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·2 years agoAgreed. “Ignorance of the law is not an excuse” is currently impossible to correct.
I don’t think commenting under a clickbait picture is the best way to have a serious discussion
You can’t have a serious discussion with a person who follows a millennia old book
You sound like someone who hasn’t read or study much
Lol spelling errors aren’t a great way to try and play smart
Oh, and that’s what the other side is pursuing - a serious discussion?
Spare us. The other side is out for blood. No discussion is detailed in Project 2025.
I’m not sure what you are talking about is this post related to US politics?
Is US politics not related to this post? I mean, in any way?
Then why did you do it?
I’m pointing it out, same people seem not to realize it.
Ironic. 🤣🖕🏽
If we swap the word “bible” for “lawbook” does your opinion change?
If we had it all active laws in one book, that would be a huge step in the right direction.
Agreed. “Ignorance of the law is not an excuse” is currently impossible to correct.