alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 years agoMore confusion for recruiterssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square12linkfedilinkarrow-up1105arrow-down14
arrow-up1101arrow-down1imageMore confusion for recruiterssh.itjust.worksalphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square12linkfedilink
minus-squarecalcopiritus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up22·2 years agoMake it strongly statically typed. Dictionaries and lists must have all their items of the same type. For extra confusion.
minus-squareMHanak@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 years agoEven better: make it purely functional
minus-squaredwraf_of_ignorance@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-22 years agoEven betterer: make it MOP(Monad Oriented Programming). IYou pray to a supreme being monad till your program works.
minus-squaremexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 years ago require compilation
minus-squarelad@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoAnd tuples should have the same types inside. And dictionary keys should have the same type as that dictionary’s values 😈
Make it strongly statically typed. Dictionaries and lists must have all their items of the same type. For extra confusion.
Even better: make it purely functional
Even betterer: make it MOP(Monad Oriented Programming). IYou pray to a supreme being monad till your program works.
And tuples should have the same types inside. And dictionary keys should have the same type as that dictionary’s values 😈