• Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    Not surprised. A for-profit corporation wanting more money. Especially as we enroach further into late stage capitalism where corporations struggle to find more territory to profiteer from and squeeze more profit out of us.

    The era of free services being profitable is ending rapidly, and we see this across many areas in the world.

    • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 years ago

      You’re right. I should say “profit growth” which is what corporations look for. You can have solid growth, but unless it’s growing, they don’t care.

  • pezhore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 years ago

    Jeff Geerling consistently has the most compatible, tested, updated, and well documented Ansible rolls out there. If I need to get some niche software installed and there is a geerlingguy role for it - I breathe a sigh of relief.

    If he is considering stopping support for RedHat and it’s various distros - that is massive.

  • taladar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 years ago

    I am basically in the same boat, interacting with RHEL mostly because some of our customers insist on using it. It is already a giant pain with its tiny number of packages and the whole license tool struggles. At least so far we could build our internal tooling and the software we build for our customers on simple Centos or Alma Docker containers and use those for test systems as well. But now dealing with RHEL at all suddenly became an order of magnitude more painful, especially as others will also reduce support for it in their third party software we use.

    • qprimed@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      the whole stream debacle was a massive red flag for me. at that point the decision was made to completely transition the tiny number of remaining RHEL based systems to debian and be done with it.

      red hat has contributed much to the FLOSS ecosystem and some may require the corporate backed walled garden, but stream was (and this is) exactly the sort of unhelpful drama no one needs right now.

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 years ago

    Ohh, let’s see, pay for Redhat which will rot away without community support or use one of a dozen other distros. Sorry yum, it’s been fun.

    • Nintendo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      you’d be surprised how many comps use RHEL just for the “I’m completely fucked and I need corporate level support” or “we need a data center completely off the rack” or “we wanna throw money at this problem” or “we need somebody to sue or point our finger at if we get majorly fucked” or “we need an OS that meets compliance” use cases. many comps won’t just use some random community built OS to run their shit regardless of the community support. at the end of the day, many corporations with very complex requirements don’t have many legitimate data center OS options available.

    • Klicnik@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      I have seen IBM do this multiple times. When they buy a company, they leave it pretty much alone for a year or two. Then they start to make their IBM changes to it, and change it enough to make anyone that knew the product before them hate it. IBM buying RedHat was the beginning of the end. I told my boss about it the day I read the news of the IBM buyout, “We need to stop using CentOS for any new systems.”

  • Flickertail@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 years ago

    *sigh* Do I have to go abandon Fedora now too? I really hope they don’t pull a CentOS on that one

    • hozl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      I highly doubt this would affect Fedora. Thankfully, it’s community driven and self-goverened so Red Hat execs can’t go and tell them what to do. (Though I don’t know how many ties the Fedora council had to Red Hat)

      • NaN@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        All of Fedora’s funding and IP comes from and belongs to Red Hat, this would be very persuasive. At least openSUSE has more sponsors than just SUSE.

  • NotAWhiteTShirt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    I gave up on RedHat when they gave up on the community. I wish them well, but I’m never going to use or recommend RedHat again,

  • grey@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    I know this isn’t related but: Why do I see a completely different set of comments here when I’m logged in, as opposed to when I’m not?

  • bishopolis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    While Jeff’s support for ELs has been imperfect - I marveled at the supply-chain issues gleefully baked into the drupal vagrant stuff - I came here to really say:

    IBM’s not really the poster-child for preserving the sanctity of source code in the past (cough cough Monterey cough), and I’m surprised they’re even suggesting everyone respect their own demands around that.

  • TAG@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    The chatter around the water cooler at my office is that this may kill Rocky Linux and AlmaLinux (at least as downstream forks of RHEL). It will be very painful for companies that want RedHat support for their production systems but don’t want to pay for RHEL licenses for developer test beds.