• @cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        161 year ago

        An alternative is to keep your eggs somewhat separated so that you don’t end up in a locked in situation if their services deteriorate over the years, giving you an easier escape in that scenario.

        • Yep! That’s what I do. I use just about everything else in Proton’s ecosystem, but I choose to use Bitwarden as my password manager. Just feels like better practice to not be wholly dependent on Proton for all my security.

      • @asap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I’m in their ecosystem but specifically don’t use it, as it seems extraordinarily unsafe to put my passwords behind the same authentication that I use just to check my email.

    • @krash@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      One thing protonpass does better then the competition is exporting your passkeys that is generated within it. AFAIK, bitwarden supports creating and authenticating with passkeys, but you cannot export them.

    • @cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      If you have a paid plan you can generate SimpleLogin aliases directly when generating a login on a webpage. It’s a very nice feature.

  • Cyborganism
    link
    fedilink
    English
    231 year ago

    I’m very skeptical about online cloud-based password managers. I don’t trust that at all. I still prefer to use a local off-line password manager like KeePassXC.

    • @ComeHereOrIHookYou@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I’m using both. Mainly I use KeepassXC for most stuff (including my Proton account) because aside from the other security things it offers (like encrypting the database with a keyfile and challenge response), it also gives me a choice to add files into my password entry

      I just use Proton Pass because of its easier access to email aliasing and occasionally sharing of sensitive data by sharing them a separate vault

      • @currawong@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Same here, I use both KeePassXC and Bitwarden. But I dont store heavily sensitive passwords on Bitwarden, like my email passwords, encryption retrieval keys, etc.

    • @ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      If self-hosting makes you feel better about it, Vaultwarden exists for the Bitwarden client.

    • @mino@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What is your threatmodel here?

      The problem for me with completely self hosting it is that it’ll be relatively hard to get my backup, availability and sync requirements satisfied without a lot of effort.

      Whereas I trust encryption in theory enough to hand my encrypted data to anyone. If the implementation is properly audited then I also trust that.

      Most of my passwords are for accounts with 2fa anyway so even if both the storage leak and the encryption turn out to be subpar my threatmodel is still not violated.

  • @LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    621 year ago

    If we didn’t already have the perfect option that is bitwarden I would probably go for this. But there’s really no reason to switch away from bitwarden to this. It’s open source, gets regularly publicly audited, and nothing ever leaves your device unencrypted. So even if they had their data center broken into and all machines stolen physically I wouldn’t have to worry about my passwords

  • QuizzaciousOtter
    link
    fedilink
    321 year ago

    I’ll stick with KeePassXC but I’m still very happy to see them remembering about Linux. I hope Drive will be next, this is something I’m really waiting for.

  • @narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    The last big feature missing for me now is support for SSH keys with an SSH agent. This is such a great feature of 1Password and I use it daily. Can’t switch before that, even though Proton Pass is already included in my Proton subscription.

    • Avid Amoeba
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Why switch from 1Password? One less subscription? Suspicion about 1Password enshitification? Something else?

      • @narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        I think 1Password is great. The best password manager for me by a long shot.

        Proton Pass is lacking features I need/want and the UX is still superior with 1Password for now, but should Proton Pass catch up, I’ll happily save some money, sure.

  • DumbAceDragon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    Gives me hope for a proton drive app. As soon as that’s available and viable I’ll be able to drop my mega subscription.

  • @perishthethought@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    As scientists, we know that transparency and peer review lead to better security.

    What? App developers are scientists now?

    I know this originally came from CERN, but I find it hard to believe those same folks are working on this now.

    • Para_lyzed
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      While I don’t particularly agree with the sentiment, those in the field of Computer Science could be argued to be “scientists”, though often not in the classical sense. As a Computer Science major myself, I would never consider myself a “scientist” in the classical definition of the term. Those involved in actual research, yes, though that does not describe me despite the title of my Bachelor’s. I would consider those involved in the theoretical side of Computer Science to be more akin to mathematicians, as most of the theory is based in mathematical proofs and models (take for instance the field describing formal computational models as a means to defining how computers operate, and how effective specific algorithms are in that context). Though I could understand the argument that those involved heavily in the theoretical side of Computer Science may be considered scientists, given their similarity to theoretical physicists. In that sense, there is also active experimentation to test hypotheses about algorithmic runtime. It’s a fascinating niche of Computer Science that I studied briefly in university, but likely will not be pursuing in the future.

      Generally those involved with active development of commercial software don’t fit into that category, though. It’s very much a question of semantics.

      • @shapis@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’d never admit it irl or to anyone I know because it’s petty. But it bothers me when cs people refer to themselves as engineers.

        Referring to themselves as scientists would seriously be a step past that.

        • Para_lyzed
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It really depends on the individual case. There are many CS professions where the title “engineer” or “scientist” is incredibly accurate. I believe that is a minority of course, and further depends on how broad your definition of “cs people” is. There are specialties within the incredibly broad field of computer science that require education in classical engineering, as well as specialties that focus on research and experimentation with the scientific method.

  • Still no plans/pricing for Proton Pass Family (only the full proton suite).

    Proton is missing many users with this simple lack of effort; not everyone wants drive, vpn, etc.

    Some folks just want a password manager for the immediate and extended family; and often times we are willing to just pay a few bucks extra per month and not worry about helping these people after they get hacked, due to terrible passwords.