• SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      The reveal for example.

      Been a while since I read the book, and the reveal was similar, but a lot better in the movie

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Starship Troopers - the book was extremely meh - the movie is excellent (and very relevant to modern day).

    Clue - an excellent movie based off a fucking boardgame… ditto for Barbie now as well!

    Mage the Acension is a TTRPG love letter to Ars Magicka and it blows it out of the water.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      TBF that was a low bar to clear. They just had to make sure the show was better than a bunch of screaming children.

      However it is truly fantastic

  • Veraxus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 years ago

    The Mist

    That ending was one of the most brilliant gut-punches in film history. Stephen King himself said he wished he had written it.

  • SolidGrue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    2001: A Space Odyssey (1968), at the time of its release, was based on a short story called The Sentinel by Arthur C Clarke. In that story, the roots of the Tycho Monolith plot segment of 2001 of is sketched out, and then expanded as both a screenplay and a full-length novel.

    • NotNotMike@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      One thing that always stuck out to me about the book is the introduction of certain editions. The author writes about himself researching the history of the country the story takes place in and describes it as real, saying he took his son to a museum with Inigo’s sword and everything.

      I was Googling furiously when I read it because I was so confused. I was astounded that the place (and people) was “real”. It took a bit of research to find that the author just does this bit and hasn’t let it go since he wrote the book

      I’m still so charmed that he tricked me. It made reading the book that much sillier, for me

      • kromem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        I had a teacher that worked for the publisher and talked about how they’d have a series of responses for people who wrote in for the part of the book where the author says he wrote his own fanfiction scene and to write in if you wanted it.

        Like maybe the first time you write in they’d respond that they couldn’t provide it because they were fighting the Morgenstern estate over IP release to provide the material, etc.

        So people never would get the pages, but could have gotten a number of different replies furthering the illusion.

  • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    heres a controversial opinion: The American Office vs the UK Office.

    While I respect the original, Gervais’ external antics and the much meaner, darker humor just don’t create as good a comedy vehicle that enables the viewer to laugh and have fun and enjoy themselves watching the show

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      On that note, wasn’t Whose Line is it Anyway originally British? Because Drew Carey’s was peak!

      • Deebster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Huh, so it is! Growing up in the UK, the US version seemed to be on more, and I’d assumed that that was the original.

        • AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          That’s funny. Growing up in the US, Comedy Central would run marathons of the original Whose Line so I ended up watching the UK version more than the US one.

  • Mandy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ill be killed for this but…Lord of the rings. Like, im sorry book purists but even after reading the books twice. Tolkien, is and always will be, THE high fantasy author, the one who basically made things we take for granted today. But the music from Howard Shore. So many scenes like from how fellowship began, to DEEEAAAATTTTHHH to Sam just being the broest bro to ever exist. I dont mind all of the cuts and changes they did, i happily return to the movies all year every year, the books? not so much.

    • EvanescentWave@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      The movies are awesome, but as a bookworm I would rather say they’re doing justice to their source material. I’m rereading more than rewatching, but I guess I’m not normal (And no worries, we book purists don’t kill people who have actually read the book)

    • RBWells@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I am an avid reader of books, and not a movie buff, but I stand on this hill with you. The LOTR movies are better than the books.

  • pingveno@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    The Magicians: The books were good, but the TV show really was in a class all its own. And it did away with using obscure words just because, that was annoying.

    Game of Thrones: At this rate, ASOIAF is never getting done, so I’m by default giving it to the show for actually finishing the job.

    Good Omens: The first season brought the book to life, but there wasn’t source material beyond that. The second season did a great job fleshing out the characters and moving the story forward into the final season.

    • CylonBunny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’d rather the five released ASOIAF stay as they are, perpetually unfinished than anything close to the hatchet job that was the GoT show ever be released in book. For me, sometimes just finishing isn’t enough. The books > than the show 10,000 times.

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Okay, fair. I’m mostly just frustrated that GRRM is taking so damn long.

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Blade runner. Much better than “Do androids dream of electric sheep?” but it is only loosely based off it.

    PS: when reading a book after watching a film, it usually feels like the book is much better, fills in details, separates scenes which a film had mixed together or altogether done away with. E.g. The Shining, LotR, Dune…but for Androids I just felt “what, that’s it?”

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      The truth of the matter is that a lot of PKD and Heinlien era sci-fi was very focused on exploring a single theme - that works well literary but isn’t rich enough for TV/Movie - so those works generally got richer and usually were by transitioned by genuine fans that tried to keep the theme and core message.

      • MicrowavedTea@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        I feel this is mostly the case with short stories (and a lot of those works were short stories). Where there isn’t enough material for a full movie, the writers are free to add more to the story without messing much with the original. DADOES did have enough material but the movie decided to go a different direction while keeping the main theme. I wouldn’t say one is better than the other in this case as they’re pretty different.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      They’re almost too different to compare imo, but both the book and the movie are top-tier.