• tranxuanthang@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Hopefully I don’t get many downvotes for this, but it isns’t necessary to deny anything related to AI and bombard Mozilla for this. Sure, Copilot is a disaster, because it is a service and will call home to M$ and collect your data. But all of what Mozilla offers us is on-device AI, which is exceptional. I’ve been waiting so long for on-device AI-based webpage translation, so people don’t need to rely on external services like Google or Bing to translate any more.

    • joojmachine@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 years ago

      Same, their local translation tech is absolutely great! If they keep working “AI” features that are pretty much quality of life ML stuff I’m all in for it.

      • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s fun playing with local AI stuff. I’ve been playing with piper-tts and it’s fast on a modern system.

    • maxprime@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve heard a lot of people talk about vertical tabs but personally I don’t see the appeal. Can you explain to me what is desirable about vertical tabs?

      • dditty@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 years ago
        1. You can have tons of tabs open while still being able to read what they are

        2. Moving the tabs to the side of your browser window frees up more vertical real estate which better matches the webpage layout of most websites, which otherwise have wasted space on the left and right sides of the page when viewing them on a computer

    • seadoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      But only if it results in reclaimed vertical real estate! Vertical tabs in edge is a a net loss in screen space, which makes it pointless in my opinion

    • joojmachine@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Good luck convincing people to switch to it based only on “it loads pages faster than Chrome” though. It’s a good goal to have, but getting tunnel-visioned on it when their current speed in real world use is pretty comparable is definitely not a good long-term plan.

      • NostraDavid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Soon, Firefox can block ads better than Chrome. Ads are annoying. I see Chrome losing at least a 5% of the market, if not more, to Firefox, just because they’re going to break uBlock Origin, and Firefox isn’t.

      • nieceandtows@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m not talking about pulling more people. I’m talking about my issue as an existing and looooong term user of Firefox. I started using a very low end phone recently, and Firefox vs Chrome on it is night and day difference. I don’t notice it on my galaxy phone, but on low end devices it’s torturous.

        • joojmachine@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 years ago

          Oh, you mean FF for Android? Yeah, on that front it really needs a ton of work. On the desktop side things are pretty much fast to a point where in real world use the difference is minimal.

        • VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          I still use it all the time exept when a page crash. Wich unfortunately happened too often with Firefox lately. I have a Pixel 8 and it crashes/freeze when scrolling heavy pages or PDF.

          It’s annoying that the browser I want to use is crashing so often. But I won’t use Chrome unless I’m forced to, wich the only reasons I was forced to was Firefox freezing.

    • Adolph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      The only thing Mozilla should be doing instead of working on useless stuff and wasting resources, as usual.

  • FIST_FILLET@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 years ago

    kinda excited to see what their native vertical tabs will look like. i’ve been using sidebery for the past ~3 years and i’m extremely satisfied with it, i somehow doubt their native version will look as good

    • dracs@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Even if it doesn’t look as good, it’ll hopefully include some better APIs that extensions can utilise to improve their experience. E.g. hide the native tabs.

      • FIST_FILLET@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        hide the native tabs

        YES! i currently have to use custom css to achieve this, would be so much more convenient if it was an extension

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    There’s a lot of doom and gloom online about this, but to me these seem like welcome changes 🤷

  • Derpgon@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    Finally, the only two features I’ve been missing - tab groups and profiles. With all the modern internet browser stones, we’ll be unstoppable!

  • zecg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    2 years ago

    Pretty please, fuck off with the AI. It’s really not something I need from a browser, don’t inflate your download size for a screen reader, just MAKE IT OPTIONAL in every way.

    • robber@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I totally agree regarding making it optional, but I have to say the idea of auto generating alt texts sounds like a really useful application of AI - no one really likes to do that manually yet a significant number of beautiful people rely on it.

    • crusty@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m looking forward to a local ai-powered translator so I don’t have to send data to google or bing

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      You sound like you have no disabilities that make it hard for you to use the Internet. Good for you.

      If AI can add usability features that help people use the Internet easier then that’s a good thing. You don’t need to use it. Why complain about software being capable of helping others?

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Afaik nearly every feature/product Mozilla has shipped with Firefox in the past has been optional. So surely these will be as well.

  • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    We are approaching the use of AI in Firefox — which many, many of you have been asking about — in the same way. We’re focused on giving you AI features that solve tangible problems, respect your privacy, and give you real choice.

    We’re looking at how we can use local, on-device AI models — i.e., more private — to enhance your browsing experience further. One feature we’re starting with next quarter is AI-generated alt-text for images inserted into PDFs, which makes it more accessible to visually impaired users and people with learning disabilities.

    NO! I don’t want AI in my Firefox. If Mozilla really adds AI, I will consider switching my main browser since Firefox 1 came out.

    • wisha@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      Are you aware that Firefox Translate uses AI models[1] to translate text and it’s already included in current versions of Firefox?

      [1]: not a completion/instruction LLM, but still very much a “language” model

    • tranxuanthang@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t want AI in my Firefox. If Mozilla really adds AI, I will consider switching my main browser

      Don’t know why you anti-AI so much. An on-device AI is absolutely fine to me, and it’s not like Mozilla will force you to use it. Remember the world is not about only you but also people having disabilities.

      • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        Remember the world is not about only you but also people having disabilities.

        Remember the world is not about only for people with disabilities. Secondly, this is a nonsense argument, because this does not “require” Ai. Especially not for every user. If its integrated into Firefox and I cannot remove it, then its very much forced. Why not make an extension for people who need or want it? (nobody needs this)

        • tranxuanthang@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          I think there is only one thing worth answering in your reply:

          Why not make an extension for people who need or want it?

          For web page translation, it is considered a very basic feature that should be there by default in all mainstream browsers (e.g. Chrome), but Firefox hadn’t provided this feature for a very long time.

          For any AI-assisted accessibility feature such as image tagging, my opinion is that it is even more important to make it easily turn on, rather than requiring user to search and download some extensions, which might be a too hard task for a disabled person.

          • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            You missed my point entirely. If it is an extension that is installed by default, because a minority needs it, then at least the majority who don’t want it can remove the extension. This is especially more important because it is AI and not a regular program. AI is always a black box that cannot be verified.

            And if its too hard for a disabled person to install extension, then its probably too hard to use Firefox in the first place. That’s nonsense argumentation. But that’s not even my actual argumentation and I think you guys try to misunderstand me, just because I don’t like what you like. AI in the browser is bullshit idea, it does not matter if its disabled or not person. And not something “required” as the base minimum, that cannot be removed.

  • VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Fix freezing/crashing bugs on android first ! I don’t need nor want AI. I need and want a stable browser.

  • evulhotdog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    The way that profiles works today is the reason I don’t use it. Chrome just handles it all so gracefully between profiles and opening links from other applications.