Wait until she finds out about daemons.
My atheist configuration doesn’t allow me to believe in daemons: https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10022442/37361421-26026212-26f3-11e8-8e97-d5136bce5e41.gif
daemons are just minor greek gods (but okay not like many people know that daemon and demon are very diferent things)
I’m pretty sure demons are simply chaotic evil creatures of the Abyss while daemons are neutral evil creatures of Abaddon.
deleted by creator
I like “orphanize” - one of those things that shouldn’t be a word, but is!
umbilicalCord.cut()NGL, Orphaniser or Orphanizer sounds like one hell of a metal band name
Alternatively a depressingly realistic look at the consequences of war for non-participating children, couched in the veneer of an 80s Sci-Fi movie.
“YOUR PARENTS WILL NOT BE BACK”
impl<'a, T: Child> ChildRef<'a, T> { fn orphanize<T: Child>(r: Self) -> Orphan<T>; }
SendToBoardingSchool()-- |Removes the given object from its current parent, if any, and then adds it as a child of the other given object. kidnap :: ChildBearing c p => p -- ^The kidnapper. -> c -- ^The child to kidnap. IO ()def callCps()
Theoretically, where would one find a child to sacrifice? Asking for a friend.
I mean if you want to be really evil you could forcibly create your own then sacrifice it during gestation.
Inb4 normies force us to change well established terminology just to appease their fragile souls
Like git’s main and master
Look, we already got rid of “Master/Slave” in favor of things like “Parent/Child”, “Active/Standby”, or “Primary/Secondary”. We’re not making more changes because right-wingers are afraid of everything.
“Okay Todd, looks like Steve is working on auth, so you’ll be on the blacklist today-… ahah I mean, working on the blacklist today ahem…”
do we still have mother and daughterboards?
Surprised she didn’t freak out with the line below. It’s already gone on a killing spree…
I’m surprised she managed to read five of the words.
I like how at the start of the line it explicitly says “out of memory” but we’re just pretending this is some satanic bullshit.
She obviously read the error to find “kill process” and “sacrifice child” but still ignored the memory error
Right, because non-technical people would be expected to understand what an “out of memory” error means
The point is, it’s cherry-picking
You have so much to learn about people who feed into the Satanic panic. Cherry picking is by definition how they get there. One of Alex Jones biggest boggiemen for years was a subsection of a law that allowed medical testing on troops, and he always ignores the very next section that states that it all requires informed consent. Then lies and act like people would have no idea.
During covid he found an exercise that tried to assume 4 different future scenarios that may come into play, and ignored the positive leaning ones or nuetralish ones and went straight for the heavily authoritarian exercise because it used a possible pandemic as a background setting, then claimed it was all planned out and proof Covid was a bioweapon attack.
People like this willfully ignore things that give context, and will often repackage it without the context anytime they can.
When sacrificing the child, use a dagger made from obsidian. Cut upward from below the sternum, then force the rib cage apart. Push the lungs aside with your hands, then cut out the heart with your ritual dagger. Hold the heart up to the cheering crowd, and then place it in an earthen vessel in honor of the gods. Kick the body down the steps of the temple pyramid.
This ritual is common, but it has a bug in it that can be traced back to a specific SacrificeOverflow comment.
That’s what happens when you use a knife shaped in a crescent moon.
Just wait until she learns child processes get aborted
While most people on Lemmy are going to know what this means, the person who wrote this error message was definitely trying to be cute with that phrasing.
So my first role as a developer I’m working on an application that runs various classes for children, the parents sign up but it’s children they’re booking for.
We use reactstrap and there is a package called buttonasync and it has a method of executingChildren, let’s say I was a little confused.
return ( <Form onSubmit={onSubmit}> <FormGroup> <Label htmlFor="name">Name</Label> <Input type="text" name="name" placeholder="Name" value={props.name} /> </FormGroup> <ButtonAsync type="submit" color="primary" isExecuting={isSaving} executingChildren={<><FontAwesomeIcon icon="spinner" spin /> Saving...</>}> <FontAwesomeIcon icon="save" /> Save </ButtonAsync> </Form>
THE BELOW MESSAGE
That’s not how adjective order works.
It’s nonstandard but gets the point across. English isn’t a programming language.
Please disregard the next message.
Please disregard the above message.
Please disregard the below message.
Please disregard the following message.
Please disregard the last message.
Yet?
“It is not even wrong” - Wolfgang Pauli
