The United States House of Representatives has overwhelmingly passed a bill that would expand the federal definition of anti-Semitism, despite opposition from civil liberties groups.

The bill passed the House on Wednesday by a margin of 320 to 91, and it is largely seen as a reaction to the ongoing antiwar protests unfolding on US university campuses. It now goes to the Senate for consideration.

If the bill were to become law, it would codify a definition of anti-Semitism created by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

IHRA’s working definition of anti-Semitism is “a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-Semitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities”.

According to the IHRA, that definition also encompasses the “targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity”.

The group also includes certain examples in its definition to illustrate anti-Semitism. Saying, for instance, that “the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor” would be deemed anti-Semitic under its terms. The definition also bars any comparison between “contemporary Israeli policy” and “that of the Nazis”.

Rights groups, however, have raised concerns the definition nevertheless conflates criticism of the state of Israel and Zionism with anti-Semitism.

In a letter sent to lawmakers on Friday, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) urged House members to vote against the legislation, saying federal law already prohibits anti-Semitic discrimination and harassment.

“Instead, it would likely chill free speech of students on college campuses by incorrectly equating criticism of the Israeli government with anti-Semitism.”

Archive link

  • sweetpotato@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    2 years ago

    So it’s ok to call students that are protesting against a genocide Nazis but not the people actually committing the genocide. Got it.

    • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s OK to call anyone not aligned with the Republican Party a Nazi, because it’s important that words have no real meaning. Once words have no meaning, the ideas behind them fade as well. This is double plus ungood.

      • MrVilliam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 years ago

        Hey!

        Aw who am I kidding, I know my country’s bloodstained history despite my public education. I wish I could say it was in our past and that we’re better now, but we’re literally funding this exact genocide. 🫠

    • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It would also help if more than a handful of people in the House knew semitic is a pretty archaic term and would include Palestinians in Gaza as well as Israelis and people from several other countries as well.

      Protected classes are race, religion, national origin, age, pregnancy status, gender, citizenship, disability or veteran, family status or genetic information. Nobody gets protections for genocide.

      Edit: genetic not generic

  • Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    2 years ago

    Adding IHRA’s definition to the law would allow the federal Department of Education to restrict funding and other resources to campuses perceived as tolerating anti-Semitism.

    The campus crackdown is definitely going too far. Vietnam War protestors were treated the same way. It escalated, and the cops opened fire at Kent State.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The state guard fired on students at Kent State not the cops.

      The difference today is kids got guns and will fire back.

  • john89@lemmy.caBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    What the fuck?

    Fuck zionists and their disproportionate amount of control over the world.

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      The genocidal world order. The civilized nations see them for the monsters that they are.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Good thing their silly religious stories will never come true.

      Imagine being disappointed for eternity.

      • Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Zionism is a racist colonial ideology, merely using religion as a tool. Theodor Herzl, founder of zionism, said so himself

        “We should there form a portion of a rampart of Europe against Asia, an outpost of civilization as opposed to barbarism. We should as a neutral State remain in contact with all Europe, which would have to guarantee our existence.” Source [II]

    • Arcturus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Always the same map

      A bit surprising that “israel” didn’t vote against it, but that would be a bit too on the nose I guess.

        • Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 years ago

          China didn’t colonize the world like western Europe and Japan did, then make neocolonial institutions like the IMF and World Bank to preserve those colonial relations.

          They’ve mostly escaped colonialism and become the manufacturing hub of the world now, but wealth isn’t being extracted from the Global South / “former” colonies to China like they are being transferred to the imperial Core.

    • cobra89@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      It seems like the US voted against it because Russia was using it as a political ploy and excuse to try and invade Ukraine. (Ukraine is “full of Nazis” sound familiar?)

      That’s why Ukraine voted against it too.

      The United States says it was one of three countries to vote against a U.N. resolution condemning the glorification of Nazism over freedom of speech issues and concerns that Russia was using it to carry out political attacks against its neighbors.

      Ukraine and Palau were the other no votes.

      “We condemn without reservation all forms of religious and ethnic intolerance or hatred at home and around the world,” said Deputy U.S. Representative to the Economic and Social Council Stefanie Amadeo, explaining the U.S. vote.

      “This resolution’s recommendations to limit freedom of expression, freedom of association, and the right to peaceful assembly contravene the principles enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and must be opposed,” Amadeo said.

      The UN resolution wanted to quash “antisemitic” protests very much like the ones we’re seeing in the US right now. So really if you’re against the Bill this post is about, you should be okay with the US voting no on that UN resolution.

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    If this happened under Trump liberals would be up in arms. But it’s happening under Biden, so they don’t give a shit.

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Once Obama got in office, Democrat stans suddenly didn’t care about the Global War(s) on Terrorism anymore. They were silent on his star chamber as well. It was a real wake-up call for me.

  • okamiueru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 years ago

    Are all Israelis Jewish? The US is such a fucking joke at this point. And it’s tedious to block community after community on lemmy to avoid the noise of vapidness. Good luck with your fucked up politics.

    PS: I’d recommend excluding US specific news from “world news”. Not sure if this stuff is moderated, or if those who do, give af about it.

    • Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 years ago

      The politics of the global hegemon affects the entire world, as much as we hate it. Specially when it’s regarding a country they’re currently committing genocide in.

    • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      3/4 are Jewish which is an overwhelming majority but I also think there are great reasons to separate the classifications of Israeli and Jew. Mainly because the state is not led by the religion but instead by elected leaders.

      Though that separation of church and state does seem to be diminishing as Bibi and his far right ultraorthodox cronies do seem to be slowly turning it into more of an authoritarian state.

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.mlBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Being Jewish is not the same as being Zionist. One of them has Nazi moral intent, and it’s not the Jews that oppose Zionism.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    These people must know all this does is destroy the legitimacy of your authority. Israel is committing genocide. Its happening. Changing legal definitions will not change how many bodies are piled in Gaza. The mounds of dead children cannot be legislated into something moral.

  • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    As a Jew I have never felt less respected by Congress than them appropriating the concept of antisemitism to further their own oppressive political ends. Fuck it’s so gross.