• breadsmasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    Personally I see planned obsolescence as exactly capitalist innovation - the innovation being how to extract more wealth from people

    • Mandarbmax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Joke lands better with fewer words so I upvote this one instead of the other, similar comment you made. Both were good.

  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Planned obsolescence took off in the 1950s. It’s not new, or exclusive to electronics. It’s funny this article criticizes Apple over Samsung or Google. Apple provides hardware repair for 5-6 years after manufacture.

    • lemmyng@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Apple may provide repairs, but if the repair costs as much as a new device then it’s planned obsolescence in disguise.

    • ☭ Parabola ☭ @lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      A new logic board costs as much as a new computer. Hard drives are impossible to replace, RAM upgrades are hard, and even opening a Mac or iPhone voids your warranty. Not to mention all their nonsense with macOS upgrade requirements, batteries, and so on.

  • HowMany@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Capitalist = SELL

    Capitalist innovation = SELL MORE

    I mean, they weren’t lying. mostly.