• Spendrill@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 years ago

      No, but here he is trotting out the line about Schizophrenia, which is a real risk, but is dwarfed in its societal impact by the downsides of alcohol. I don’t expect he’s said anything at all publicly about the impacts of that though, which would suggest that he’s the talking head that the German press always contact for a negative comment about cannabis every time it hits the news. Especially as this is reported by Die Welt which is an Axel Springer publication.

      • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Funnily (well, not really, but what can we do but laugh), the other cited source, businesses insider, is also an Axel Springer publication. As is Politico, Morning Brew, and some other stuff.

        So they aren’t just a German problem anymore, they’re now everyone’s problem.

        • Spendrill@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Like we do any better without Springer in the Anglosphere. If it’s not Murdoch metastasising everywhere it’s one of the Bannon/Koch Foundation appendages.

          • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yeah. I’ve gotten so tired of checking all the sources in algorithmic news feeds that I went back to an rss feed of news agencies, and trusted papers. Media landscape kinda sucks.

    • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      okay but the statement he made fits into a societal context such that the overall message being sent by a group of people that have Oktoberfest but make cannabis illegal is absolutely “cannabis bad, alcohol good”.

    • 3volver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s not even the argument which was being made if that’s what you’re implying.

      Their argument is simply: why is alcohol legal if it’s much more harmful?

      • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        But… alcohol should be legal, no? Despite the harm it causes, prohibition simply does not work.

        Cannabis can also cause harm (albeit less harm than alcohol) but should also still be legal. And other drugs like fentanyl (arguably) cause more harm than alcohol…but should also be legal.

        Prohibition is literally never a realistic solution to any drug or drug problems. Not a single country has ever had success.