• Pistcow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 years ago

    And who started the withdrawal and left only 2500 troops in Afghanistan by the time Biden took office?

    • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      36
      ·
      3 years ago

      You can not like or dislike that we left Afghanistan, but you cant say it wasnt a shitshow of a withdrawal. If you cant admit it was botched then you are not being rational.

      • Pistcow@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 years ago

        You can initiate a troop withdrawal from a 20-year conflict with less than 4 months of your presidency, but you can’t select a supreme court justice unless you have an R next your party affiliation? Biden inherited a shitshow with no other option to get out as fast as possible. He’s barking at the wrong guy, of course.

          • horsey@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            I’d be fine with that analysis. Both presidents fucked up. Republicans are, like classical narcissists, never willing to admit they did anything wrong and eager to blame all their mistakes 100% on other people.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 years ago

          There was nothing wrong with withdrawing, I 100% support that, he just did it really really badly. Do I need to remind you how botched it was?

          • Dkarma@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            More botched than the lies that got us there in the first place? No? Cool cool

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 years ago

              Uh, not sure how you compare those two things, but yes we should not have not been involved in most of the wars we have been involved in for the last 80 years, including Iraq, Afghanistn, Ukraine, and Isreal.

      • unphazed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Trump refused to share any existing plans until Biden took office. Guy couldnt hit the ground running, he had to play catchup because for the first time ever a Prez refused to hand the torch. With Covid killing more than troops in a war, that took priority, then all the other domestic shit he got left with, insurrectionists, and a few months for the withdrawal (which should have had a plan in place already)

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 years ago

          So your theory is that the government is not big enough to deal with other problems and make and execute a basic plan? I was never a general and I could tell you what to do very basically because its very obvious.

          • unphazed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            Why aren’t terms for Presidents one year? I takes time. Time he was not afforded. His predecessor barred him from key details and plans. Its like dumping an outside party into a CEO position and expecting a company to right itself in one quarter, without providing them any details other than “here’s our files”. It’s not possible (except Musk but see how that played out). Government is big, with lots of people who oversaw it. And yeah, Trump could have had plans in place but he was too focused on “stolen votes” to care.

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 years ago

              Except he had plenty of time and it was not complicated to do something different. Do you understand all they had to do was have the withdrawal point from Bagram AFB, and tell the taliban to stop marching toward the capital and that would have solved all the problems? I feel like you dont even know what happened are just repeating a bullsh1t talking point.

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        Yeah, don’t know why you’re catching down votes. The withdrawal was a rushed shit show. It was always going to be a mess, but literally announcing a complete withdrawal with a wholly inflexible timeline was just handing anyone who cooperated with the gov a death sentence.

        I volunteer as a healthcare provider with an NGO that helped settle a lot of translators who worked with the military from Afghanistan to the US. Hearing about their last days escaping Kabul is always harrowing and they all left family behind.

        • zaph@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          Yeah, don’t know why you’re catching down votes.

          Because the person he’s replying to didn’t say anything to warrant that response. They never commented on how it went just pointing out the person this guy was protesting isn’t the one who made the withdrawal plan and took over too late to do much about it.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          To armchair quarter back the problem, they needed to just be at bagram AFB and tell the Taliban (or whatever group they were) to stop coming toward the capital til it was over, and take away the weapos if they were never going to fight for their country. I think that would have done it.

        • horsey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 years ago

          It’s directly above in the reply chain:

          who started the withdrawal and left only 2500 troops in Afghanistan by the time Biden took office?

          But kind of like Republicans blamed Obama for not ending the wars they started, the blame is now all on Biden.

          • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            I don’t think anyone here is trying to blame Biden for the totality of withdrawal of Afghanistan. But it appears that most people in this thread are trying to deflect any sense of responsibility from the president.

            He could have slowed down the time table, he could have pulled more troops to give families and allies more time. We shouldn’t have a knee jer reaction to valid criticisms of politicians. That just gives cover for all the invalid criticism to sound more credible.

  • oxjox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    “He is the father of Marine Lance Corporal Kareem Nikoui, who was KIA due to Joe Biden’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan,” Mast said online. “Joe Biden may try to turn the page on Afghanistan after his incompetence cost American lives, but NOT ON MY WATCH.”

    Last August, on the two-year anniversary of the explosion, Biden released a statement to mourn the lives of the service members and civilians who were killed in the “horrific terrorist attack.”

    https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/08/26/statement-from-president-joe-biden-honoring-sacrifices-of-the-service-members-killed-in-the-terrorist-attack-during-the-withdrawal-from-afghanistan/

    We will forever honor the memory of the 13 service members who were stolen far too soon from their families, loved ones, and brothers- and sisters-in-arms, while performing a noble mission on behalf of our nation. We can never repay the incredible sacrifice of any of the 2,461 U.S. service members who lost their lives over two decades of war in Afghanistan or the 20,744 who were wounded. But we will never fail to honor our sacred obligation to our service members and veterans, as well as their families, caregivers, and survivors.

    Today, Jill and I remember and mourn these 13 brave American service members and the more than 100 innocent Afghan civilians who were killed in the horrific terrorist attack at Abbey Gate. Many more were injured and will carry the impacts of their wounds and the horrors of that day for the rest of their lives.

    We pray for the families of our fallen warriors. We grieve with them, we honor them, and we will always continue to support them.

    The ignorance and stupidity in this country will most certainly be our demise.

  • NovaPrime@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    3 years ago

    Meh, fuck him. His son signed up to go murder people in their own country for a paycheck and it bit him in the ass. Waaah.

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      Step 1) Act immorally

      Step 2a) Nothing goes wrong - No problem! Step 2b) Something goes wrong - Continue to step 3

      Step 3) Complain

    • krolden@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      China is better than USA but to say things like this don’t happen everywhere makes you look like an idiot.

      • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.mlBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        It is perfectly okay in my view to poke Anglo liars who shit on rest of the world. We will not accept it anymore, and they do not deserve humility.

  • horsey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    3 years ago

    People with a ‘but free speech!!’ angle, let me know what country you think it would be okay to yell at the President or Prime Minister during a speech and then refuse to leave.

    • regul@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      This is exactly how Prime Minster’s Questions work in the UK.

      I expect that Americans know nothing about other countries, but I thought maybe you’d know something about at least the UK.

      • horsey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        Congress members have made interjections during State of the Union without being censured or removed. But also, that’s the Questions segment. That’s what they’re SUPPOSED to do. I have seen that, thanks.

        • regul@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          It’s pretty much just called “questions”, and the shouts are typically not questions either.

          • horsey@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            I do like how that part of the political system works there and it’s refreshing compared to the formality in the US. But keep in mind the distinction between random members of the public yelling things and elected representatives. People yell stuff at elected officials all the time here, and do things like protest when they’re walking or driving by, but it’s different than interrupting the largest speech of the year.

      • MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        3 years ago

        Lol, what a ridiculous take. He’d have been locked up if he did that in a movie theater, let alone at the State of the Union address.

        • horsey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          The charge he’s getting is so light that it would probably be worse to get a municipal misdemeanor for disorderly conduct.

          • MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 years ago

            I’m glad he’s getting a slap on the wrist, losing a child will mess any parent up…and they were still right to throw him out.

            • horsey@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              Funny thing is if any politician were to sympathize with him over losing a child it would be Biden.

              Yeah, I wouldn’t see the need to have this guy charged with anything or really punished at all.

  • squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 years ago

    oh no! Not shouting?! Lock up that undemocratic lunatic. We don’t allow public criticism of our government officials.

  • MarcoPOLO@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    56
    ·
    3 years ago

    Freedom of speech and the right to protest are when you get arrested for shouting at the person responsible for the death of your son.

        • horsey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 years ago

          You can protest all you want outside. Someone would get kicked out of a school board meeting for this. Free speech means the government can’t arrest you for the content of what you say or restrict political assembly.

          • MarcoPOLO@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            30
            ·
            3 years ago

            Congress shall make no law […] abridging the freedom […] to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

            • oxjox@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

              It is legal to peaceably petition the government for a redress of grievances.
              It is illegal to disrupt the Congress and demonstrate in the Congressional buildings.

            • MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 years ago

              Yet another moronic comment from you. Having the right to petition the government does not mean you can disrupt official proceedings and refuse to leave when ordered to by the police. It’s the content of speech that’s protected, you can’t go to jail for saying Biden sucks…you can go to jail for disrupting official proceedings and trespassing. You’re pretending the right to free speech gives one the right to conduct that speech however they want, and that is again…an incredibly stupid thing to suggest.

              • oxjox@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 years ago

                How bizarre is it that people simply choose to misinterpret plain English?

                One law says you can peacefully petition, the other says you can not be disruptive and obstructive.

                This should not be something anyone finds arguable.

            • horsey@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 years ago

              Good job, but our rights don’t include standing up and screaming during official proceedings. It’s more that the government can’t arrest him for writing an op-ed or Twitter feed criticizing Biden.

                • horsey@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  It does not guarantee the right to disrupt official proceedings, sorry. Like I said, go try that in a court. Walk in and start protesting about a political issue and claim you’re allowed to under the 1st amendment. This isn’t exactly the first time someone has tried that btw.

    • horsey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 years ago

      Try going in a courthouse and yelling at someone during a hearing.

      Hell, try going in a Post Office and yelling at someone.

        • horsey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 years ago

          I used that example because they are also federal property as opposed to private property. It seems you missed the point, though. Free speech doesn’t mean you can create a public disturbance.

            • horsey@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 years ago

              The entire story and event are Republican media stunts. Yes, the guy lost his son and is upset. But blaming Biden for it (like OP did - “his fault”) is about like what they did with Clinton and Benghazi. Strangely it comes up often on Lemmy, “I’m so leftist that I repeat and amplify exactly what Republicans say!”

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      3 years ago

      Nah, his son was responsible for his own death. I won’t say he deserved to die but I will say I dgaf about dead marines.