• TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    PipeWire is great.

    I remember a lot of people kicking up a fuss about it years ago saying it’s a mess and we should stick to PulseAudio or routing audio to ALSA, but personally for me it’s been great, far less troublesome than previous solutions, and the vast majority seem to agree.

    The pain points were short-lived and now we’re reaping the benefits of having a modernised, easier to maintain, less janky system. Credit to the devs, and to the distros who pushed it.

      • HuntressHimbo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 years ago

        Having been a linux user around the time of both rollouts I’ve had a way better time with pipewire. We’ve come a long way since OG pulseaudio

        • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          I seem to remember canonical rushing pulse into an LTS before it was actually ready. Not the first time they’ve done that either.

    • Fisch@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The latency is insanely low on Pipewire, which is important for rythm games like osu!, that’s why I originally switched to it. It’s also really cool how it’s compatible with all other audio backends as well.

    • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      With Wayland it was either break everything and improve, progress, and innovate over time with something actually maintainable & expandable,
      Or… make x11\Xorg 2.0 and have to rewrite the entire stack yet again in only a few years.

    • lengau@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      The transition for me was “install Pipewire and its pulseaudio compatibility package, remove pulseaudio, reboot.”

      There are a couple of quirks (updating Apparmor rules makes KDE think I’ve reattached all my audio devices), but it’s mostly pretty smooth.

  • excitingburp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    PipeWire wins in the feature-set game, which is why it is being preferred over PulseAudio.

    According to the inventor of PipeWire, this is the wrong perspective to take. PipeWire is preferred over PulseAudio as a server, clients (apps) should continue to use the PulseAudio/JACK APIs because the PipeWire API is not designed for general use (it’s designed for things like pipewire-pulse and pipewire-jack).

    • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      So the middleware stays the same but the underlying server changes? That’s an amazing strategy I wish Wayland did this instead of breaking damn near everything with it’s strange restrictions on behavior and overlays

      • NekkoDroid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        2 years ago

        The thing with Wayland and X11 is: this couldn’t really be done because of how fundamentally broken incompatible X11 is (and there is XWayland for most clients that mostly works)

      • lengau@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        That’s what xwayland is.

        Apps can talk to xwayland with the x11 protocol but instead of an X server rendering it, your Wayland compositor renders it.

        The restrictions come from the fact that those x11 behaviours are exactly things the industry has decided are a bad idea and should be replaced.

        • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Really? Like not letting apps draw over other apps? As far as I know Windows still allows that, so does even Mac OS. I don’t know who in the industry decided that screenshotting is a bad behaviour and needs to be removed but maybe they should find a new industry, like fast food line work for example.

          • Ullebe1@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Allowing any app unrestricted access to the input and output of any other app (like in X11) is a terrible security practice. It allows for trivially easy keyloggers and makes horizontal movement to other apps after the first has been exploited super easy.

            Many people’s answer to this is “then just don’t run untrusted apps, duh”, but that is a bad take since that isn’t realistic for 99% of users. People run things like Discord or Spotify or games or Nvidia drivers all the time, not to mention random JavaScript on various websites, so the security model should be robust in the presence of that kind of behaviour. Otherwise everyone is just a single sandbox escape in the browser away from being fully compromised by malware installed with root privileges. Luckily we know better now than when X11 was designed and that is the reason for things like Bubblewrap (used in Flatpak for sandboxing), portals and the security model of Wayland.

            And in the end: the people who decided this are the people actually willing to do the work to build and maintain the Linux desktop stack. If anyone knows what the right approach is, it’s them.

            • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              I’m a cybersec MSc and the security model you’re describing is that of the clipboard.

              Apps interacting with each other is also how just about anything works on a computer since multi tasking OSes.

              Flatpaks and Snaps are also DOA along with Wayland lol.

              • Ullebe1@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                Nice appeal to authority. Are you referring to a formalised security model (of which I’d love to read more, if you have a link?), or the actual clipboard on your PC?

                But not all interaction is equal. Access control and granularity of permissions is something X11 is sorely lacking in, which Wayland has built in. Which is why X11 is a bad fit for common treat models and Wayland is not.

                Ohh, @LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com said so, so it must be true! I’ll let you keep believing that while I enjoy them and watch them grow in popularity and usage, just like Wayland.

                • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  I’m referring to the actual clipboard on your PC, yes.

                  Don’t get me wrong ofc X is not without issues at all, but Wayland is like chopping off your arm at the elbow because you messed up some nail polish, and you arguing for it is like saying that now since you don’t have that arm anymore no one can break it, while all the other OSes watch on in horror and embarrassment as they allow all access to screen elements to any random app like god intended.

                  If you got malware installed it’s all over anyway. Why bother with weird screen access when you can just ransom the home partition and all personal files instead?

                  Without OBS, Discord, Steam, Guake, proper screenshot tools, etc. it’s not really a functional OS anymore for general use and that’s what you get with Wayland.

                  If Wayland fixes all the issues with it I’d happily switch, but it likely won’t since they are fundamental to it’s design and if so then the only way it will secure Linux desktops is by making no one ever use one again.

  • 🦊 OneRedFox 🦊@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Pipewire was honestly the most pain-free introduction of a new audio technology on Linux; it was a nice change of pace.

  • electricprism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    I miss the pulseaudio restart command.

    Sometimes my 3.5mm aux isn’t detected in pipewire until I reboot.

    pulseaudio -r used to do the trick iirc