• @CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    651 year ago

    That’s an excellent analogy, to say “you can buy palworld for that” which really makes it hit different for me.

    It shows you how absurd it is, even with it being optional. It’s still absurd.

    • @9715698@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      171 year ago

      The cosmetic skin prices in D4 are absolutely laughable, and the fact that they can only be used with ONE class make it even more bonkers.

    • @Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -111 year ago

      Most people could buy palworld if they just cooked their own food instead of ordering.

      Pretty silly to start saying this with Diablo really, when we can do the same with so many other products and services as well, Ofc it’s really silly to charge 30 for a digital paintjob. But im not gonna police what other people do with their own money.

      They worked for it. They spend it.

  • @Mokujin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 year ago

    I played launch and the first two seasons. The game is not fun, but they clearly spend a ton of resources cranking out skins.

    Skins are somewhat cool, but shit value since they only work on specific classes.

    Meanwhile, skins in POE, arguably a more enjoyable game though dated, are usable across all classes.

    Not exactly apples/oranges due to gender locked classes, but still.

    • @Wermhatswormhat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      And PoE has some of the most expensive cosmetics I’ve seen and even they aren’t as bad as a $30 color variation portal. PoE balances it out because the game is free to play. What’s Diablo’s excuse?

    • MamboGator
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I played through the story once and then uninstalled it. Biggest waste of money I’ve spent on a game.

  • @BustlingChungus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1051 year ago

    I an so sick of the “just don’t buy it” response to people complaining about increasingly shitty practices. It’s like if someone pisses in the far side of the pool and other people decide they like the warmth so they tell you just to stay over on the far side - The pool is still tainted, and maybe next time the pool cleaners decide not to use chlorine…

    • @Bronzie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      361 year ago

      It’s not that you can’t complain, but moreso that people are tired of reading about people getting ripped of over and over again.
      It’s getting old when the solution is so glaringly obvious.

      Alternatively focus your grievances towards the company. That has a better chance of making an impact in reducing the tainted waters.

      So in short: you have a right to complain, but we have a right to tell you that you are a part of the problem if you pre-order or support companies continually doing this crap.

      • @RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        All this while there are plenty of other companies worth supporting. Sure it isn’t your favorite franchise, but we aren’t surprised leopards ate your face, again. I gave up on all those games from these companies and have found a lot of enjoyment elsewhere. Sucks but I refuse to give them money that makes this a viable model for them to fuckup over and over.

      • @HAL_9_TRILLION@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        Alternatively focus your grievances towards the company.

        But why would the company care? They’re marketing directly to a certain kind of person here. Anyone that would pay these prices - and plenty must pay because Blizzard hasn’t blinked ONCE during any of this bullshit - has so much money that they wouldn’t care if the colors were three times that.

        Blizzard acts like their bread and butter is the upper-middle-class and it must be true because they don’t change at all as near as I’ve been able to tell. Not only do their sales not take a hit, they just keep growing.

        • @Bronzie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Oh I agree with you wholeheartedly friend!
          They don’t care because people keep buying their shit anyways, which is why many of us tell you to stop buying it and then we’ve gone full circle again.

          I’m not recommending complaining to them because I think they will care. I do it because I it could have a greater impact than complaining here which has exactly zero impact.

    • @Coreidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Use a different pool where people aren’t pissing in them. They exist.

      There are plenty of other games that don’t pull this shit. Play them instead.

      • @nyctre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        171 year ago

        First they did it at EA, but I didn’t say anything because I don’t play EA games. Then they did it at Ubisoft, but I didn’t say anything because I don’t play Ubisoft games. Then they did it at Blizzard, but I didn’t say anything because I don’t play Blizzard games. Then they did it at fromsoft games, but I didn’t say anything because I don’t play fromsoft games. Then they did it at supergiant games, but I didn’t say anything because I don’t play their games.

        Then they did it at every other fucking company because it was industry standard.

        • @Coreidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -41 year ago

          Then they did it at every other fucking company because it was industry standard.

          All you’ve listed are the big publishers. Of course THEY are going to do it. They are publicly traded company’s where they need to draw blood from a stone and pull out as much value as possible to appease their shareholders.

          You’re absolutely wrong about every company doing this. It sounds like your only experience is AAA titles.

          Play some indie games and you’ll see the difference. Significantly better designed games, built from passion, and without all the bullshit you see with AAA games.

          Like I said find a better pool where people aren’t pissing in them. They exist.

          • @nyctre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            I used recognizable names, including respected names such as fromsoft and supergiant which aren’t even doing it. The point I was trying to make was that the more normal and accepted it becomes, the more it will be done and it might eventually become the norm. Like the YouTube title/thumbnail trend. “We have to do it because of the algorithm! We don’t make money otherwise”

      • @abraxas@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        In fairness to the complaints, there are fewer and fewer good clean pools, and they tend to be the less-and-less awesome ones.

          • @abraxas@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 year ago

            I didn’t say that there are no good games. But genres have been drowned in these microtransaction games enough that it has become disruptive. I find myself sometimes playing games that are in many ways inferior to older games because they are trying to be low-budget disruptors in a market where the high budgets are largely “filled with urine” as it were.

            Look at a few companies’ recent “people are just going to have to get used to subscriptions/microtransactions” attitudes. It’s going the same way television has gone. One cannot pretend in good faith overall quality in entertainment is not going down for reasons that the decisionmakers know to be hurting the products.

      • @RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I know this is a metaphor, but where exactly do they exist? If you’re in a public pool, it’s not like you can go to another town and use theirs. And if it’s your own, chances are you only have one.

        • @Coreidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          Public pools aren’t the only pools. There are literally millions of pools in the world. You have options even when you think you don’t. If you limit yourself to the one and only public pool in town then you’re limiting yourself by only thinking in a box.

          There are hundreds of thousands of games in the world. Many of them aren’t AAA garbage fleecing their customers. If you limit yourself to only AAA games then you’re limiting yourself by thinking in a box.

          Go on and explore the world already. You have more choices than you think you do.

  • Nakedmole
    link
    fedilink
    English
    80
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    People who decide to throw money at games with such shitty practices are part of the problem.

    • @SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      281 year ago

      I’d say they are victims of predatory practices.

      Like drug addicts. You can’t expect drug addicts to take all the blame. Sooner or later you have to realize that the supplier enabling the addiction is part of the problem.

      • Nakedmole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’d say they are victims of predatory practices.

        That is a very good point regarding children and mentally challenged people. It does not excuse responsible adults though.

        Like drug addicts. You can’t expect drug addicts to take all the blame. Sooner or later you have to realize that the supplier enabling the addiction is part of the problem.

        That is not the most fitting comparison in my opinion. I think the solution for the drug problem is legalization of all drugs, free access to rehabilitation combined with thorough education and abuse prevention.

        • @CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          To some people, $30 is chump change and they’ll gladly part with it for some glitter. The whole microtransaction business relies on those people as “whales” and you can’t really ask people to “stop paying so much” if they don’t even mind the amount they’re paying

        • @jacksilver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          I think the point they’re making is that these things (drugs and games) are being designed to be addicting. Game companies literally hire physcologist to design systems that play into addictive personalities. It’s unfair to put all the blame on the person given how these companies act.

          • Nakedmole
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s unfair to put all the blame on the person given how these companies act.

            Agreed. That´s why I´d split the blame between the companies behind such games and their customers and also think selling microtransactions to children and mentally impaired people should be illegal.

      • @De_Narm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        361 year ago

        That may be true if you’re into some F2P/gacha stuff, but not in a full-price game. These people just encourage more enshitification. Diablo used to have no microtransactions and was arguably a lot better too.

              • @Menteros@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                91 year ago

                Do skins improve the game? No.

                It’s ‘wasted’ effort that could be put into making a better game. It’s the concept of opportunity cost but applied to the quality aspect.

                • @EatATaco@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -71 year ago

                  Do skins improve the game? No.

                  For me? Absolutely not. But I see plenty of people who love their skins.

                  It’s ‘wasted’ effort that could be put into making a better game.

                  Or, as my experience with the super cell games, it pays the bills and I get more content without paying anything. Seems like a win win to me. If they aren’t making any money from it, why are they going to create more content?

            • @EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -91 year ago

              Or it pays the bills so they can afford creating new content. This is how it always worked with the super cell games I played.

              • @LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                81 year ago

                I’m not saying it doesn’t contribute to their bottom line, but it’s not the devs who profit off of microtransactions. It’s the share holders. Game development has existed since the 70s, microtransactions have not. The primary people benefiting from microtransactions are shareholders. And if anything the work load on developers has gotten significantly worse and the quality of games has not gotten better.

                Microtransactions suck.

                • @EatATaco@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -61 year ago

                  Games haven’t gotten better since the 70s? Lol if you honestly believed that, then micro transactions would be a complete non issue for you because there are countless games out there from before micro transactions, and without them at all, that you could spend a whole life playing.

                  But let’s be honest here, games have gotten better which is why you want to play the news ones.

                  I’ve played a lot of super cell games and never paid a dime. Years and years of fun across multiple games, with new content coming out all the time. All funded by micro transactions paid by others.

                  Now I don’t approve of the gambling aspect of some and p2w can be bad if done incorrectly. But cosmetic purchases that take little time to create and can generate tons of money so I don’t have to pay? Sign me up every fucking day for that. Please pay so I don’t have to.

        • @EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -31 year ago

          I know I am because I played 3 super cell games, each for years, and never paid a dime.

      • Nakedmole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They’re the reason these shitty practices are profitable in the first place. Don´t forget we are talking about Diablo IV here, which is a full priced game. Off topic you might have a point concerning F2P games though. However, even the F2P games that are not P2W are usually at least to a certain part “pay for functionality/content/convenience” and not just purely “pay for cosmetics”. Because of this I think it´s generally better to pay once and get a full game for that.

      • Nakedmole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, Diablo 2 was the last good Diablo game. Hate blizzard, love PoE!

  • @Butterpaderp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -11 year ago

    I bought d4 on sale and I’ve gotten 110 hours out of it. Idk why I should be upset about some optional cosmetics that I’m never gonna buy.

  • JokeDeity
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    I’m glad I played the beta so I knew I wouldn’t be interested in buying the full game.

  • @arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    I think the issue here is people knew Diablo 4 was filled with monetization, season passes, cosmetic items etc and they bought it anyway and are complaining about it after the fact. The correct way to respond to sleazy companies is to take your business somewhere else. Reward games for being good, not for being cash grabs.

  • @Fosheze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -21 year ago

    This may be an unpopular opinion but as I see it most of D4s microtransactions are fine (still a trash game but that’s a different point). They’re mostly just cosmetics. They only exist so that people who want to can throw money at the company. If you don’t want to buy them then just don’t buy them. Like this portal recolor one. Sure it’s $30 but it isn’t like there is any advantage to buying it. It’s not giving you faster warps to town or more xp or anything like that. It’s only there for you to throw money at blizzard and have a graphic showing that you threw money at blizzard. If you don’t want to throw $30 at blizzard for no gain then don’t throw $30 at blizzard for no gain. If a bunch of whales want to throw away their money on cosmetics then let them.

    • MamboGator
      link
      fedilink
      English
      271 year ago

      Please see this very thorough Jimquisition video that debunks the harmlessness of “purely cosmetic” microtransactions. They are predatory and feed on those who are most vulnerable like addicts and the neurodivergent.

      https://youtube.com/watch?v=7S-DGTBZU14

    • @jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      This is mostly a me problem but I get mad at the very idea of someone spending $30 on a skin. That is such a clash with my values it’s upsetting.

      Like, I don’t want to slide all the way down the “why spend any money on fun when people are starving” slope. I understand that people need some joy in their life.

      But I just don’t see how the skins in these games bring joy anywhere near the money charged for them. Like the title, you could buy a whole other smash hit game for that much money! Plus tons of other non game stuff. That’s a small dinner with friends. That’s a small band’s concert.

      So I just get kind of mad that people are spending their money on this stuff at all. It’s not a good use of money. Stop it. Be better at money. Reminds me of an old friend’s idiot brother that would blow his money on expensive not-bulk soda and candy when he needed a new keyboard. Like literally failing the marshmallow test.

      But I can’t control other people. Sadly.

      That’s before any of the “blizzard wants money. They see the huge ROI for this stuff. It’s a better ROI than other content. They will make more skins instead of other content” train of thought.

      With apologies for this longish rant.

      • @MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -21 year ago

        But I just don’t see how the skins in these games bring joy anywhere near the money charged for them.

        The simple answer is that, for a fair amount of people, $30 isn’t a notable purchase, such that it’s not particularly a substitute for anything else they may be interested in doing.

        • @jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Is that true? Something like 40% of Americans don’t have $400 on hand. Maybe the people spending money on this trend wealthier?

          I feel like you’d have to be pretty wealthy for $30 to be unremarkable.

          • @MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -21 year ago

            Maybe the people spending money on this trend wealthier?

            I mean we’re already looking at a fairly expensive hobby in gaming, which is going to skew towards people with more money in the first place.

            And just speaking from my own perspective as solidly middle class, $30 is pretty comfortably within what I can spend without particularly thinking about it. Like yeah, I obviously can’t just throw $30 at everything I see, it adds up over time, but it’s low enough that I don’t particularly have to think about exactly where it will come out of my budget.

            And fwiw, I tend to avoid most in-game micro transactions, because I simply don’t value them all that highly. I barely even care about getting free unlocks in most games.

    • @ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      There’s a number of reasons that “it’s just cosmetic” is bullshit.

      • Developer time and effort is limited. More effort on cosmetics is less time on other things.
      • “free” cosmetics will intentionally be made worse than premium ones to drive conversions.
      • the game loses the ability to reward impressive feats with cosmetics, as that harms sales.
      • a non-zero amount of your time is spent being driven to purchase cosmetics.
    • @Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      In addition to that jimquisition that another user commented, remember that its easy to say “it doesnt affect me if i dont buy it” but people do buy it. Some people spend silly money on cosmetics and if people keep dojng that then it encourages game companies to spend less time on making the games good and more time on pumping out cosmetics.

      The proof is in tbe pudding. Games are mostly shit now.

      These are massive companies whos sole aim is to make money, not entertaining games. They dont care, they will just follow the money.

  • A Wild Mimic appears!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    who needs D4 or their cosmetics? I’m just waiting for Crate to release the new Grim Dawn Expansion, will probably be cheaper than that recolor too lol