No really, these books are what you get if you answer the question “What if after the Mist came, the surviving humans rebuilt a Steampunk civilization with magic airships and uplifted cats?”

I was gonna say this is now my head canon, but I actually think he’s so obvious about drawing the connections in this book it’s a little beyond head canon.

Anyway, since I feel sure it will come up if I start a conversation about these books on Lemmy, feel free to use the space below ↓ to hate on Jim Butcher for his MenWritingWomen problems… They’re real and they bug me too. They just don’t stop him from telling a fun and engaging story, which this was for me.

  • @Zonetrooper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    Definitely enjoyed the first one, didn’t notice any problems with it myself. What was remarkable to me, is that he manages to make the three-dimensional combat easily follow-able, something I see a lot of authors struggle with.

    • The Bard in GreenOPA
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      There was a bit less airship combat (although it’s still definitely a thing, especially toward the end) in book 2. Two REALLY epic duels though. The duels were so good, when I got to the end of each one I went back and reread it from the beginning.

  • Piecemakers
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How apropos that steampunk is what you get when you slap half-cocked period fashion on highschool theater tier drama and handwave science (ie. physics, economics, politics, ecology, etc.) to cobble together tired tropes for semi-literate self-styled “outcasts”… Basically Twilight for LARPers. 🤷🏼‍♂️

    edit: I see steampunk cringe doesn’t hinder the ability to silently downvote. Cute.

    • Tar_Alcaran
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I could make a very similar argument for basically every genre of fiction. The vast majority of authors suck at worldbuilding, but that’s because it’s mostly unneeded for the story.