• Franklin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Agreed. If it was any company at all except Amazon there would be hope but come on. We’ve all seen what they did to the fire sticks

    • Semperverus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 years ago

      https://pine64.com/product-category/pinephone/

      https://pine64.com/product-category/smartphones/pinephone-pro/

      There is already something in the works (that you can technically buy right now if you wanted), and it actively respects your freedom. Granted, as with everything in this ecosystem, its a very slow burn, so it’ll be a while before the software is actually good, but it’s already made massive strides from where it started.

      I would say wait a bit and take a look at this later, but i do have one friend daily driving one now to some success (this wasn’t possible a year ago).

      • droans@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        That would be great, but you can buy a $20 burner from a gas station that’s more powerful than those phones.

        The regular version uses the Allwinner A64 chip which retailed for $5 when it was released… Back in 2015.

        The Pro version uses the RK3399S, which is a custom lower binned version of the RK3399. Neither chip was made available retail, but the SK3399 was released in 2016 and only otherwise used in low-end Chromebooks and SBCs.

        • Semperverus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Sure, but calling them out for not being a $20 burner phone doesnt make sense when you’re comparing that to a developer/development device. This phone specifically isnt meant for everyday consumers. What it is, however, is a signal that there is now a third competitor in the works, and it’s real and tangible.

    • oxjox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I just read an article about how they’re increasing advertising on their Fire TVs. Rest assured, an Amazon OS is an Advertising OS.

      Although, from what I’ve gathered of public opinion online, there’s LOTS of people willing to forgo their privacy in exchange for free shit.

      Edit: Oh…

      They say they expect Vega to begin shipping on Fire TVs early next year.

      And that article https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/11/after-luring-customers-with-low-prices-amazon-stuffs-fire-tvs-with-ads/

  • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Oh so I won’t be able to sideload streaming APKs onto any new Amazon devices? Guess you can fucking keep your shit hardware then

  • Arthur Besse@lemmy.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 years ago

    oh great, yet another platform that will use free software to restrict what people can do with their computing devices 🤮

    how is this supposed to be a good thing? 🙄

    • wavebeam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m not sure how this is in any way different from android? Android is free software they use to restrict the computing they devices they sell to push more ads and junkware. This is just a different one. Amazon sucks, so I don’t see what move they could make that could be seen as positive. Just don’t buy their garbage devices.

  • Atemu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    TL;DR Amazon is building a Linux distro that starts a chromium to run react native apps. Apparently, you need hundreds of people for that.

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 years ago

    Amazon out here thinking “could you imagine how much cheap garbage we could try to sell people if we can harvest literally all of the data directly?”

  • SmokeyDope@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Amazon can’t make TVs or ereades without filling them to the brim with ads and spyware like the greedy shits they are, I dont want to think about how screwed up their OS would be. As much as I sneer at Microsoft and windows BS as a snobby Linux user I get the impression amazon would be way worse and make Ol Gatey boy say ‘have a little class, would you?’

    • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      If it runs Amazon-Linux it won’t take long for someone to build a Wamazon Linux distro with all the features and none of the crap.

      • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        If anything, it’ll be a thing where amazon ends up close sourcing the code/parts that they create after forking whatever OS they decide. That, or they’ll just close source the entire codebase 100% before release without any regard or repercussions.

      • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        it won’t take long for someone to build a Wamazon Linux distro with all the features and none of the crap.

        I don’t know what “features” Amazon would include that aren’t somehow directly tied into their store and ease of shopping…aka “crap.” It’s not like they would build a better video/audio driver or something. It would all just be more…advertising and analytics, probably on a cheap platform as hardware has never been their largest source of income, to include Kindles (AWS is, last I checked). Strip those two out of their build and we have essentially an untouched kernel lol, at least that’s how I see it happening.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 years ago

    Apps are going to be written in React Native

    So despite the desire for one, Vega won’t be an Android-killer, won’t bring an influx of big name apps to benefit regular Linux distros, nor see Amazon do something crazy cool like create its own Linux tablet UI.

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 years ago

      You know how much overhead Electron apps are? Well, here’s React Native! Enjoy all the annoyances of mobile development with the ugliest that is React!

      (I kid. Or am I?)

    • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      Apps are going to be written in React Native

      Idk if I’m the only person who thinks this, but I feel like React has gotten worse over the last couple of major versions. Not only does the code look a lot messier when you use their new syntax, but the end result seems unreliable. Facebook is barely even usable now. Their history management is laughable, and it’ll drop you out of the site randomly when using the back buttons. I used to think React was really neat, but I’m not a big fan anymore. There’s too much re-engineering for problems that were solved decades ago.

      • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Damn…I’m trying to modernize my personal app’s UI and I thought react was the shit. What is the recommended framework now?

        • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          If you like it, then use it. There’s no point in jumping every time some new framework comes out. Most of them don’t last. I have used React off and on since it came out, and I personally don’t like how the syntax has changed. My personal website is React and doesn’t have any browser history issues. Idk what’s up with Facebook history management. I guess they just don’t care very much because they’re too busy trying to gobble up data.

          • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            Honestly this. You’ll rebuild it in a few years anyways.

            If you absolutely want your project to survive after 15 years…

            Either web components using vanilla, or hell, just go jquery. Jquery is impossible to kill.

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        React is having the same problems Angular had, and jQuery had. New ECMAscript features make formerly complex things easier, and JS frameworks adapt.

        Lots of solutions. But as more edge cases start to show up, they continue to add more and more little things that shape the language into more different variants.

        Many of the changes are pretty good. But New devs will go, “Why are there 7 ways to do this React thing?” And that adds to the noise.

        Again, that’s not a React problem. It’s just coding in general. PHP also had a “damn you ugly” phase. But unlike PHP, I don’t think React (and most JS frameworks of today) will continue to be as popular as some hot new JS framework in 2027-2030 sweeps the landscape.

        • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          And PHP will still be chugging along. lol. It’s weird that React syntax went from being fairly pretty, and structured, to looking like a plate of spaghetti. Usually languages and frameworks go the other direction.

          • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Not at all knocking PHP.

            I love how PHP 7 looks, and PHP 8 only continues to improve.

            Totally agree. React is going backwards. Vue is so attractive. Heck, I’m even starting to rebuild react apps in Web components because react is getting weird.

  • brax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Lmao, they can have fun with that. I can’t imagine it being anything decent. A mobile phone equivalent of a DVD Player OS lol

  • Drito@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    These tentacular megacorporations are a problem. Amazon is OK as a merchant, MS as an OS developer, Google as a search engine… If they do vertical integration the market is corrupted.

    • UnknownHandsome@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m really dumb. Can you expand on vertical integration and how it corrupts? I’m not sure what it is or why it’s bad.

    • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Honestly I feel like you have microsoft backwards, in my experience their hardware is so so much better than their software

  • fury@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Good luck getting all the developers to rewrite their apps. The only reason you had any apps was because it was based on Android so it was little to no effort to port. Going plain ol’ embedded Linux is basically the death knell of your developer story. Source: been there, had no third party apps, switched to Android

    • warmaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m sure they have thought of this, I wonder if they plan to use web apps, or Waydroid, or something else.

      Also, there’s a chance mobile Linux could benefit from sponsorships, contributions, etc

        • andruid@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          Oh man PWA as a replace to traditional apps have been promised for a while. On one hand the promise of write once run anywhere on the other less ability to lock down your app from your users (good for us, but not popular in the mobile space at the moment)

          • Phrodo_00@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            Firefox did it like 10 years ago. I think it’s still going around under a different name in very low tier smart phones.

            • toastal@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 years ago

              You’re likely thinking KaiOS. They are still contributing what is required under MPL-2.0 but the rest is proprietary. KaiOS 3.x finally got off of a browser from 2016 as the base, but very few have upgraded their apps to be compatible (the tweaks were minor) & others have used it as a reminder that they were still ‘supporting’ a platform like whoever is maintaining or using that WhatsApp thing for chat.

              There’s also Capyloon built from B2G, but it’s still early on & is targeting touch phones, instead of feature phones.

              It would be nice to see it around IMO since it’d just be another enhancement to progressive web applications & JavaScript is a better target than Java or Swift.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Waydroid makes no sense since they are complaining people just sideload gapps.