• El Barto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    I don’t understand the point of this article. It said all that it had to say with the headline alone. Everything else is filler.

    “ChromeOS is Linux in disguise. But people already knew this.” Ok. And?

    • dinckel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      3 years ago

      Welcome to journalism in 2023. You don’t write anything out of passion anymore, you’re just filling your weekly quota with random words

        • dinckel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 years ago

          I don’t expect quality from them, that’s why I don’t really pay attention to corporate journalism. I get most of this kind of information from individual creators, and I do support those when I can

          • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            Good for you, and I’m impressed by your undefensive and unhuffy reply.

            Because the amount of entitlement I see about professional journalism really pisses me off, personally. There is a reason that much (not all) journalism is not the quality it used to be. It’s because nobody is frigging paying for it any more. Journalists are not the perpetrators in this story, they are the victims. The internet has caused their profession to implode. It’s their jobs that have disappeared on a huge scale, their salaries that have shrunk, their career choice that turned out to be a catastrophic bad move. All because of a technical innovation, basically. Well, personally I think we may come to regret the demise of this profession which served society well for at least a century. But the least we can do is stop the victim-blaming.

            Rant over. No, I am not a journalist. Very glad of that career choice.

  • YaBoyMax@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 years ago

    Maybe I’m mistaken on this, but I’m fairly certain the screenshot they describe as “Unity” is just a heavily themed GNOME. Also, I’ve never seen Xfce stylized as “XFCe.” I realize that’s not the point of the article, but just something that stood out to me.

    • LinuxSBC@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      That is actually Unity. It’s a mildly modified version used in Ubuntu Unity. Also, Xfce was also misspelled as XCFe.

    • eluvatar@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      Does anyone use Adobe apart from schools? Yes, because the students who used it at school went to work and wanted to use it there.

      • Euphoma@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        Some adobe products are way ahead of the competition (patenting useful stuff) and they integrate nicely with each other. I don’t use them out of principle but that’s why people use them.

    • frostycakes@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      I mean, it was for on campus use, but I bought one in college to have a cheap note taker and basic homework machine for on campus that wouldn’t set me back too far if it got stolen or broken. I had a gaming desktop at home and was in a non-technical major, so it worked out great.

  • sronweb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    In my desktop at home the main OS is Ubuntu, basically since more than 15 years, but I own also 2 Chromebooks laptops. I have a Lenovo Duet which i use mainly because I can run both Android and Linux apps, and it allow me to watch streaming services in offline. I would prefer to use any “gnu-linux” distro on a portable device, but if you wish to watch Amazon Prime or Netflix offline, you can only use a tablet with Android or iOs but on linux pc you are limited on web app typically, except in Chromebook which has some extra flexibility. Also I don’t find invasive so far, more or less we have the same privacy settings as in Android. As benefit it’s supported for 10 years for OS updates. And, in the future I may also decide to install a pure linux distro if I need.

  • dack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    Some Chromebooks are pretty hackable. I’ve got an older one that I reflashed with tianocore UEFI firmware. It makes for a pretty decent cheap and lightweight low power laptop. You can run basically any standard ARM Linux distro on it.

  • drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    literally, all Chrome OS / chromium OS needs to do for me to actually embrace it. is native out of box flatpack support

    one issue I might see them having with flatpack, is the permissions right now are handled kind of stupidly IMO. but if those get solved I think flatpack would be a great addition to chromium os ecosystem

    • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      As long as you have a Crostini-capable ChromeOS device, you can run flatpacks. This is actually the preferred way to run Firefox (via the Linux Flatpack).