Since the latest season hasn’t concluded yet, let’s only look at plot holes from 1990 and before.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Probably the two a half billion people claiming to identify as christian while actively opposing and taking action against any of Christ’s non-self-serving ideals.

    • someguy3@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      If there’s one good thing about Maga it’s that it clearly illuminated what a majority of these “Christians” actually are.

    • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      There are some of us that don’t do that. But yeah, even as an adherent, I see and feel what you mean.

    • Nahvi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      How does it feel to be on the same side as most preachers and weekly church-goers?

      Few things drives them more nuts than people who call themselves Christians and don’t even attempt to be followers of Christ. Trying and failing is one thing, and always an embarrassment to the church, but living like the worst dregs of society, while using that name, is worse than an intentional smear campaign.

    • breckenedge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      Wow, top voted reply. Damn Lemmy is cynical. There are many people out there doing God’s work caring for each other for no recognition, no reward. And certainly there are many folks out there too that make things look really bad, and the media loves to tell that story, but don’t for a moment think that that’s every Christian.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        I don’t think it’s fair to complain about assumed absolute statements and in the next breath say “damn lemmy is cynical”.

        Obviously every christian isn’t a hypocrite.

        Also obviously, too many are.

        • breckenedge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          You’re right. Just sad to see this being the highest rated comment on something that I really didn’t expect to have at all to do with religion.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 years ago

            The biggest real-life plot holes and you didn’t expect something that directly affects 8 out of ten people (and indirectly affects the other 2) on the planet to come up?

            Anything that affects that many people is going to have real life plot-holes:

            America nominally fought its last war in 1945, but we’ve had soldiers fighting and dying in dozens of countries ever since.

            Fossil fuels and unregulated pollution is proven to be destroying the recent period of relative climate stability and fossil fuel companies are getting paid by the government to stay in business.

            America produces enough food to feed the entire country(and probably several others) but created laws that force you to throw it away.

            Bigger the event, bigger the plot holes.

      • Gnome Kat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        The best thing these unrecognized christians “doing God’s work” you say exist could be doing to help the world right now is to be actively and vocally trying to oppose the Christians that are currently very loudly advocating for fascism. There is literally no bigger threat right now. There is a clear imbalance in voices in the Christian community. The good Christians could be just as loud if they wanted, they could be setting an example, but they aren’t. People always say it’s just a “few” loud voices when talking about the bad things being said, if it only takes a few to be that loud then why the fuck are the good ones silent?

  • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    2 years ago

    The details around the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand really jump the shark. Must’ve been a drug-fueled writing session on that one

    • TotallyHuman@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      When that one aired I assumed they were going to genre-shift into dark comedy or slapstick, but they… really, really didn’t.

    • Digital Mark@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      “The War to End All Wars” was a good season finale, but then just 20 years later they made a sequel with bigger effects budget and openly evil villains. Lazy writing. And the way things have been written towards WWIII but then backing off is a long season tease.

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    2 years ago

    The fact the Pepsi at one point had the 6th largest military in the world, and did nothing to conquer Coca-Cola.

    Like, why even start that storyline if you dont take it to the inevitable conclusion?

  • defunct_punk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Why would they just confirm all the fan theories about the world elite running a massive illegal money laundering ring spanning the globe, and follow it up by proving that the same elite are trafficking children for sex acts if they didn’t plan to go anywhere with that storyline?

  • quinkin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    The whole wrapping up world war 2 using “the gadget” just reeks of writers struggling to wrap up after writing themselves into a corner.

    • 100@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      The end of WW2 was a complex political issue, and the atomic bombs were not the ‘press here, end war’ that most of us believe.

      The Japanese we’re holding out hope (stupidly) that the Soviet Union would negotiate a conditional surrender with the united States as the end of the imperial system was unacceptable to them. The US had floated that if there was an unconditional surrender, that the imperial system would stay intact, but wanted it to seem like a US condition, not a Japanese one, because that would be a conditional surrender.

      The Soviets always intended to invade, but were held by a nonaggression pact they made with the Japanese. The US pressured the Soviets very hard to violate this and invade Manchuria.

      There was literally a Japanese war cabinet convened already when news of Nagasaki reached them. We have actual primary source for their reactions. They did not care.

      Only once the second bomb dropped and Manchuria was invaded did some of the cabinet manage to convince the emporer to intervene which was extremely rare.

      • Tomatoes [they/them]@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        There’s a video by Shaun that taught me pretty much all of this for the first time. It’s kinda sad that my history education was like “Bombs dropped, war over”

    • GreasyTengu@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      The writers keep doing this shit.

      The Berlin Wall arc just abruptly ended because they announced that East Germans could freely travel to the west and ‘conveniently’ forgot to mention there were still some regulations. Then the Border guards ‘conveniently’ said “fuck it” and let people pass without checking passports.

      They built up the Epstein island arc like mad only to end it with him killing himself in prison and then never mention it again.

  • nieceandtows@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t know about this series, but I play a game with the same name and absolutely hate it. It’s hugely pay to win with permadeath and the grind has nowhere near the payoff for the amount of effort you put in.

  • Moghul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 years ago

    The universe is not locally real*.

    *Locality and reality are defined in specific ways within quantum physics, and “not locally real” doesn’t necessarily mean ‘illusory’ as you might expect. Look into it, it’s some crazy shit.

  • flossdaily@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    2 years ago

    That there wasn’t a single mainstream Republican who stood up to Trump during his presidency.

    I mean, come on. Who wrote this?

    We’re supposed to believe that EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN in government went from taking about how unfit Trump was when he was a candidate … to standing behind him 100% even when he cozied up to Russia, paid hush money to a porn star, and lied about a Presidential election?

  • Zippy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Feeding incubated humans to produce more energy than what is inputted.

    Couldn’t they just suggest the computer overlord prime directive was hard-coded to keep humans alive at whatever cost?

    • Dion Starfire@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      Originally the machines were going to use human brains for processing, but apparently the explanation was deemed too technical, so they changed it to some mumbo jumbo about power, which also let them use the nickname Coppertop.

      • Zippy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        That is even better. Making humans into some perpetual energy machine seemed silly. If you are going to break a fundamental law of physics, why not use animals. At least they won’t fight back.

        • TotallyHuman@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Although…

          MORPHEUS: Where did you hear about the laws of thermodynamics, Neo?

          NEO: Anyone who’s made it past one science class in high school ought to know about the laws of thermodynamics!

          MORPHEUS: Where did you go to high school, Neo?

          (Pause.)

          NEO: …in the Matrix.

          MORPHEUS: The machines tell elegant lies.

          (Pause.)

          NEO (in a small voice): Could I please have a real physics textbook?

          MORPHEUS: There is no such thing, Neo. The universe doesn’t run on math.

          • Zippy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Thanks for the reference. I couldn’t recall exactly how it was explained. Certainly most sci-fi requires you to suspend belief and that is fine. Often there are technologies employed to make a movie interesting. Technologies that are very unlikely to be possible.

            In the Matrix, everyone was in a virtual reality and as you quoted, they could have entirely made up physics as we know it. Possibly a perpetual motion machine is viable in the real universe and that is the belief you need to suspend. Which again is fine But it is such a weak minor plot. If that were possible, why use humans? It should be possible with some algae slurry or by mechanical methods or as said, just use animals. Non if them would be a threat. In other words, what makes humans so unique that only they alone can fill this function?

            As someone said earlier, the books suggested the computers wanted the processing power of the human brain. That is a fairly easy concept to explain, is an item unique to humans alone and actually in a far future society, might be something that is truely possible. It hardly required you to even suspend belief. Not sure why they didn’t go with that.

            • TotallyHuman@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              Yeah, I like the idea of using humans for computing. Or that they don’t want us dead. I just thought that the idea that all of Matrix-physics is a lie to be such a mind screw that I had to include it.