• @NotSpez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    302 years ago

    This title almost reads like The Onion.

    On a serious note, why? These people (on both sides) have enough money saved, health benefits etc to comfortably retire. Why don’t they? Are they so bought and paid for that their ‘investors’ won’t let them?

      • @flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Maybe we can increase the laughing stock factor so there’s less of a pull. Maybe then they’ll have some better candidates?

        To be fair, after trump biden has a big act to follow and going for a nap hardly cuts the mustard…

        I don’t think it’ll work with the batshit crazy politics the us has, just fuels the division

    • Kes
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      Seniority plays a major role in committee appointments. Sure, you could replace the senile 95 year old who doesn’t know the cold war is over with a younger candidate, but that senile 95 year old has been in Congress for longer than the other guy has been alive, and he’s on some important committees because of it that the younger candidate wouldn’t be able to be in

  • @s20@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    232 years ago

    No shit? Really? Wow, thanks guys! I never would have guessed that were it not for the hard working folks at the Pentagon!

    😐

  • @BakedGoods@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    -5
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Well yeah. No one over the age of 60 is mentally fit to work any job (especially not in a decision making role). Retirement age should be 55.

    • Dr Cog
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      I strongly disagree and my job is researching Alzheimer’s and age-related cognitive decline

      Age-related decline is minor and Alzheimer’s is rare. Neither should play a role in forced retirement