Not that it’s bad. For me, it’s actually very useful, I just find it mildly amusing that an app for managing AppImages is packaged as a Flatpak, despite the two formats being widely known as competitors*.
* Okay, most people (including me) would say that the two formats are for different use cases and aren’t directly competitors, but for the eyes of a lot of AppImage purists and Flatpak critics, they are.
You must log in or # to comment.
What’s off? It’s an app for managing appimages that is hosted on flathub. Just because it is a flatpak does not mean it can’t manage appimages
edit: a word
This is not really a competition. Options are good.
Speaking of that app, I have been using it for some of my programs that are only available as an AppImage for sometime now and I can confirm it works really great.
Flathub link in case anybody’s interested
How is it compared to AppImageLauncher? That’s what I’ve been using for a few things that only ship AppImage.
Everytime they add a feature to AppImage, they just keep trying to recreate flatpak but worse.
I think we should just be happy it exists 😅
Wow, this is great! Thanks!
