• @Jesus_666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    520 days ago

    That is a lot more optimization than I’m used to. In my group people just come up with characters they want to play and the GM works with that.

    Mind you, we do discuss what kind of game we’re playing so we don’t end up with four pure noncombatants doing a dungeon crawl. But ending up with four wizards? Yeah, that might happen or even be encouraged.

    I really don’t wanna have to discuss who has to change their character concept because we need a healer or our party composition won’t be optimal.

    • @jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      219 days ago

      The idea that players all make their characters in isolation and just show up on session 0 with them sounds like such a recipe for disaster. I know it can work sometimes, much like “just grab four things from the fridge and throw them into the soup” can work sometimes. But sometimes you get like gummy bear pizza bites with shrimp and mayo topping.

      I think a lot of games that came after D&D figured out solutions to common problems, but D&D insists on staying kind of archaic.

      • @captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        119 days ago

        Yeah ime players tell the gm what they’ve decided to play when they know and the understanding is they pick something that works with everything else. Or we all decide what we’re playing collaboratively, that way if we’re all squishy controllers at least it’s on purpose