What possible, fundamental, misunderstanding of the nature of the universe could make current academics look like flat earthers?

@Daft_ish@lemmy.world · edit-2 7 months ago

What possible, fundamental, misunderstanding of the nature of the universe could make current academics look like flat earthers?

@Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml · 7 months ago

That evolution is purely randomness + fitness landscape rather than that DNA guides the process at least somewhat. Don’t burn me alive guys

@Daft_ish@lemmy.world · 7 months ago

I would expect randomness to play a larger roll than fitness.

@FooBarrington@lemmy.world · 7 months ago

In the short term (single digit generations) that’s probably true, but I don’t see how it could be on longer scales. If the random mutations decrease fitness, they won’t be passed on at some point, since there is less reproduction. If they increase fitness, they will be passed on to more individuals.

@emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works · 7 months ago

deleted by creator

@emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works · 7 months ago

What OP said is Motoo Kimura’s Neutral Theory of evolution. There’s a lot of evidence supporting it. The vast majority of mutations have a negligible effect on fitness. So it is very possible that something may evolve purely by chance.